Knox Michael R, Lacritz Laura H, Chandler Melanie J, Munro Cullum C
Neuropsychology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390-8846, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 May;17(2):216-9. doi: 10.1076/clin.17.2.216.16496.
The Dementia Rating Scale (DRS; Mattis, 1976, 1988) is commonly used in the assessment of dementia, although little is known about the relationship of performance on this test to specific cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Additionally, cognitive profiles have not been investigated across different levels of dementia as determined by the DRS. A sample of 133 individuals diagnosed with possible or probable AD was administered the DRS as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. Composite scores for the cognitive domains of attention, executive functioning, visuospatial skills, language abilities, immediate recall, and delayed memory were derived by averaging demographically corrected T scores of key measures. Individual domain scores were also averaged to develop a global index score. Pearson correlations between composite and total DRS scores were highly significant (p<.001) for all domains and the global index score, with the exception of delayed memory, which showed a floor effect. When the sample was divided into mild and moderate-to-severe groups to examine the effects of disease severity on the relationship between the DRS and standard neurocognitive domain scores, the resulting mean neuropsychological profile scores were significantly different while maintaining a parallel pattern of impairment across domains. Results demonstrate the relationship between the DRS and standard cognitive domain functions, which appears to underscore the validity and robustness of the DRS in characterizing patterns of cognitive impairment across the AD spectrum.
痴呆评定量表(DRS;马蒂斯,1976年、1988年)常用于痴呆评估,尽管对于该测试表现与阿尔茨海默病(AD)特定认知缺陷之间的关系知之甚少。此外,尚未针对由DRS确定的不同痴呆水平的认知概况进行研究。作为全面神经心理学评估的一部分,对133名被诊断为可能或很可能患有AD的个体进行了DRS测试。注意力、执行功能、视觉空间技能、语言能力、即刻回忆和延迟记忆等认知领域的综合得分,是通过对关键测量指标经人口统计学校正后的T分数求平均得出的。各个领域的得分也进行了平均,以得出一个整体指数得分。除延迟记忆显示出地板效应外,所有领域及整体指数得分的综合得分与DRS总分之间的皮尔逊相关性都非常显著(p<0.001)。当将样本分为轻度和中度至重度组,以检验疾病严重程度对DRS与标准神经认知领域得分之间关系的影响时,所得的平均神经心理学概况得分存在显著差异,同时各领域的损伤模式保持平行。结果表明了DRS与标准认知领域功能之间的关系,这似乎凸显了DRS在刻画AD谱系中认知损伤模式方面的有效性和稳健性。