FREEDMAN H H
J Exp Med. 1960 Oct 1;112(4):619-34. doi: 10.1084/jem.112.4.619.
The effect of various schedules for inducing tolerance to bacterial endotoxin in donor rabbits upon suitability for demonstration of passive transfer of tolerance to pyrogenicity in normal recipients has been investigated. Long-term treatment of donors, through 5 weeks, is no more effective than a brief series of injections, adding further evidence that tolerance is not attributable to specific antibody to the endotoxin. Qualitative differentiation of the febrile pattern of passively tolerant recipients from that seen in control animals depends upon the magnitude of the test dose of pyrogen. Passively tolerant rabbits respond to endotoxin with an acute leucopenia equivalent to that seen in controls suffering a full biphasic fever. Animals given daily injections of endotoxin continue to show the acute leucopenia, despite the early modification of the course of fever characteristic of endotoxin tolerance. The assumption that the leucopenia reflects damage to the leucocytes, with release of endogenous pyrogen, is not consistent with these findings. Rabbits rendered leucopenic by nitrogen mustard and then given endotoxin exhibit a rapidly developing fever of greater than normal intensity, the exaggeration of the febrile response being proportional to the severity of the induced leucopenia. The implications of these findings for the pathogenesis of endotoxin-induced fever are discussed. The evidence supports the hypothesis that endotoxin produces fever by direct action rather than by release of endogenous leucocytic pyrogen. It is postulated that the lesser fever, in animals having normal numbers of circulating leucocytes, reflects a limitation of available endotoxin by the known rapid sequestration in the white blood cells at the time of the acute leucopenia. It is further suggested that the biphasic febrile response of the normal rabbit results from reinoculation of the blood stream by the temporarily sequestered endotoxin, the RES of the tolerant animal clearing the released endotoxin at a rate sufficient to prevent triggering the second phase of fever.
研究了供体兔诱导对内毒素耐受性的不同方案对在正常受体中证明耐受性向致热原性的被动转移的适用性的影响。对供体进行为期5周的长期治疗并不比短暂的一系列注射更有效,这进一步证明耐受性并非归因于针对内毒素的特异性抗体。被动耐受受体的发热模式与对照动物的发热模式的定性差异取决于热原测试剂量的大小。被动耐受的兔子对内毒素的反应是急性白细胞减少,这与经历完全双相热的对照动物所见的情况相当。尽管内毒素耐受性的发热过程早期有所改变,但每天注射内毒素的动物仍持续出现急性白细胞减少。白细胞减少反映白细胞受损并释放内源性热原这一假设与这些发现不一致。用氮芥使兔子白细胞减少,然后给予内毒素,兔子会出现迅速发展的、强度高于正常的发热,发热反应的加剧与诱导的白细胞减少的严重程度成正比。讨论了这些发现对内毒素诱导发热的发病机制的影响。证据支持内毒素通过直接作用而非通过释放内源性白细胞热原产生发热的假设。据推测,在循环白细胞数量正常的动物中发热较轻,反映了在急性白细胞减少时已知的白细胞对可用内毒素的快速隔离作用。进一步表明,正常兔子的双相发热反应是由暂时隔离的内毒素重新接种到血流中引起的,耐受动物的网状内皮系统清除释放的内毒素的速度足以防止引发发热的第二阶段。