Munakata H, Kawahara M, Kayada Y, Sakamoto T, Takada K
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery I, Hiroshima University School of Dentistry, Japan.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1992 Feb;19(2):217-22.
It may not show accurate results if subrenal capsule assay (SRCA) is made only by measuring tumor size, because of infiltration of host inflammation cells resulted from host immune reaction. We developed a new method which make possible an accurate determination of chemosensitivity by measuring specific activity of succinate dehydrogenase (SD) of the tumor cells implanted in the subrenal capsular space. With reference to SDI test, the assay condition for measuring specific activity of SD was determined. A comparative study was carried out in which malignant tumors of the oral cavity serially transplanted in nude mice were tested with SRCA and subcutaneous transplantation assay in nude mice. Chemosensitivity to peplomycin (PEP), CDDP and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) evaluated SSDI method and nude mouse assay showed a high correlation than those evaluated by TGIR method and nude mouse assay. The overall predictive accuracy compared with nude mouse assay was 72.2% by TGIR method and 88.9% by SSDI method. SSDI method seemed to be a useful method to evaluate the chemosensitivity in SRCA.
由于宿主免疫反应导致宿主炎症细胞浸润,如果仅通过测量肿瘤大小进行肾包膜下测定(SRCA),可能无法显示准确的结果。我们开发了一种新方法,通过测量植入肾包膜下空间的肿瘤细胞的琥珀酸脱氢酶(SD)的比活性,可以准确测定化学敏感性。参照SDI试验,确定了测量SD比活性的测定条件。进行了一项比较研究,其中对在裸鼠中连续移植的口腔恶性肿瘤进行了SRCA和裸鼠皮下移植测定。通过SSDI方法和裸鼠试验评估的对培普利霉素(PEP)、顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)的化学敏感性与通过TGIR方法和裸鼠试验评估的相比显示出更高的相关性。与裸鼠试验相比,TGIR方法的总体预测准确率为72.2%,SSDI方法为88.9%。SSDI方法似乎是评估SRCA中化学敏感性的一种有用方法。