Blumenfeld W, McCook O, Holodniy M, Katzenstein D A
Department of Pathology and Center for Immunochemistry, Veterans Administration Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco.
Mod Pathol. 1992 Mar;5(2):103-6.
We compared the presence of P. carinii in clinical specimens as detected by standard cytomorphologic techniques with amplification of P. carinii-specific DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results correlated in 33 of 37 instances (89%): nine specimens were positive by both PCR and morphology; 24 specimens were negative by both techniques. Two specimens from one patient were obtained 3 days apart. The first specimen was both cytologically and PCR negative, while the second specimen was both cytologically and PCR positive for P. carinii. At least in some instances, therefore, PCR is no more sensitive than morphology, and other factors such as specimen adequacy are more important. Twelve of the 24 negative specimens were from patients with prior histories of P. carinii pneumonia, suggesting that recurrent disease may be from reacquisition of organisms in previously exposed individuals, rather than reactivation of latent organisms. Discrepant results included three morphologically negative specimens that were positive by PCR. It remains to be determined whether the increased sensitivity of PCR in these cases is real or artifactual. One morphologically positive specimen was negative by PCR. Polymerase chain reaction correlates well with cytomorphologic diagnosis of P. carinii pneumonia and may be a valuable diagnostic and epidemiologic tool.
我们将标准细胞形态学技术检测临床标本中卡氏肺孢子虫的情况与通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增卡氏肺孢子虫特异性DNA的情况进行了比较。37例中有33例(89%)结果相符:9份标本PCR和形态学检查均为阳性;24份标本两种技术检查均为阴性。从一名患者身上相隔3天获取了两份标本。第一份标本细胞学检查和PCR均为阴性,而第二份标本细胞学检查和PCR均显示卡氏肺孢子虫阳性。因此,至少在某些情况下,PCR并不比形态学检查更敏感,标本充足性等其他因素更为重要。24份阴性标本中有12份来自有卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎既往史的患者,这表明复发性疾病可能是先前暴露个体再次感染病原体所致,而非潜伏病原体的重新激活。不一致的结果包括3份形态学检查为阴性但PCR为阳性的标本。这些病例中PCR增加的敏感性是真实的还是人为造成的,仍有待确定。1份形态学检查为阳性的标本PCR为阴性。聚合酶链反应与卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎的细胞形态学诊断相关性良好,可能是一种有价值的诊断和流行病学工具。