Suzuki N, Oiwa Y, Sugano I, Inaba N, Sekiya S, Fukazawa I, Yoshida J, Takakubo Y, Isogai E, Saito-Ebihara M
Second Department of Biochemistry, Chiba University, School of Medicine, Japan.
Int J Cancer. 1992 Jun 19;51(4):627-33. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910510420.
The anti-proliferative activity of human interferon (HuIFN) was enhanced by dipyridamole, 2,6-bis-(diethanolamino)-4,8-dipiperidinopyrimido-[5,4-d]-py rimidine, when tested against various human tumor cell lines, including KT (breast carcinoma), PLC/PRF/5 (hepatoma), MGC-I, U251-SP and T98 (glioma), HAC-2 and SHIN-3 (ovarian carcinoma), and MM-ICB (melanoma). The enhancement occurred irrespective of the kind of HuIFN used (alpha, beta or gamma) and the original degree of susceptibility of the cells to HuIFN. Even low doses down to 0.01 microM of dipyridamole that had no intrinsic anti-proliferative activity could enhance the effect of HuIFN. The enhancement of HuIFN effects seems not to be caused by induction of HuIFN production, because neither anti-viral activity nor HuIFN antigens were detected in culture medium in cells treated with dipyridamole. Mopidamole, a derivative of dipyridamole lacking one piperidine residue, produced little enhancement of the effects of HuIFN. Among ovarian cancer cell lines tested, the enhancement of the activity of HuIFN by dipyridamole for HAC-2 and SHIN-3 cells was equivalent to or greater than that for 3 chemotherapy agents (adriamycin, vincristine, and a camptothecin derivative). However, neither HOC-21 ovarian cancer cells nor HEC-1 endometrial adenocarcinoma cells were susceptible to any combinations. When MGC-1, U251-SP, and HAC-2 cells were injected into nude mice, the growth of tumors was more markedly inhibited by the subcutaneous administration of HuIFN in combination with oral administration of dipyridamole than by the HuIFN alone. Thus, this combination therapy seems to be worth trying for human cancer, although the enhancement of the effects of HuIFN by dipyridamole varied among the cell lines examined.
