• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Subjective memorability and the mirror effect.

作者信息

Wixted J T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Jul;18(4):681-90. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.4.681.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.18.4.681
PMID:1385609
Abstract

The mirror effect refers to the common finding that hit and false alarm rates on a recognition test are inversely related. The present research investigated the generality of the mirror effect (to rare words) and tested whether the effect might be grounded in accurate estimates of word memorability. The first 2 experiments showed that although high- and low-frequency words exhibit a mirror effect, rare words do not. Furthermore, contrary to expectations, Ss consistently (and mistakenly) predicted that memorability was directly correlated with frequency of usage. These findings weight against the idea that the mirror effect arises because of a S's ability to reject low-frequency lures on the grounds that such words would have been remembered had they appeared previously. Instead, the rejection of lures from different frequency categories may be determined by their semantic or phonemic overlap with list targets, and an analysis along these lines may help to explain why rare words constitute an exception to the otherwise ubiquitous mirror effect.

摘要

相似文献

1
Subjective memorability and the mirror effect.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Jul;18(4):681-90. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.4.681.
2
Global subjective memorability and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.全局主观记忆性与识别记忆中基于强度的镜像效应
Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):807-18. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.807.
3
On rejecting emotional lures created by phonological neighborhood activation.关于拒绝语音邻域激活所产生的情感诱惑。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):847-53. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.847.
4
A bias in favor of the positive response to high-frequency words in recognition memory.
Mem Cognit. 1991 Nov;19(6):607-16. doi: 10.3758/bf03197156.
5
On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.关于识别记忆中基于强度和基于频率的镜像效应之间的差异
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Nov;24(6):1379-96. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.6.1379.
6
Word type effects in false recall: concrete, abstract, and emotion word critical lures.错误回忆中的词类效应:具体词、抽象词和情感词关键诱饵。
Am J Psychol. 2009 Winter;122(4):469-81.
7
Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect.探究词频镜像效应中排斥过程的主观报告。
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Feb;24:57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
8
Memorability judgments for high- and low-frequency words.高频词和低频词的记忆性判断。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Sep;26(5):951-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03201175.
9
The role of recollection and familiarity in the context variability mirror effect.回忆与熟悉性在情境变异性镜像效应中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):240-50. doi: 10.3758/bf03193402.
10
Dissociating word frequency and age of acquisition: The Klein effect revived (and reversed).区分单词频率和习得年龄:克莱因效应再现(并反转)。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):919-24. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.919.

引用本文的文献

1
Inference About Absence as a Window Into the Mental Self-Model.关于“无”的推断作为洞察心理自我模型的窗口。
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Apr 22;9:635-651. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00206. eCollection 2025.
2
Accounting for item-level variance in recognition memory: Comparing word frequency and contextual diversity.在识别记忆中考虑项目水平的差异:比较词频和语境多样性。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jul;50(5):1013-1032. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01249-z. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
3
Examining the role of context variability in memory for items and associations.考察情境变异性在项目和关联记忆中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):940-954. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0813-9.
4
Shifting the criterion is not the difficult part of trial-by-trial criterion shifts in recognition memory.在识别记忆中,逐次试验的标准转换里,转换标准并非难事。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Jan;43(1):49-59. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0433-y.
5
The effectiveness of updating metacognitive knowledge in the elderly: evidence from metamnemonic judgments of word frequency.老年人元认知知识更新的效果:来自单词频率元记忆判断的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Sep;27(3):683-90. doi: 10.1037/a0025838. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
6
Conjunction errors and semantic transparency.连接错误与语义透明度。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):47-56. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.47.
7
Global subjective memorability and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.全局主观记忆性与识别记忆中基于强度的镜像效应
Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):807-18. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.807.
8
Super Memory Bros.: going from mirror patterns to concordant patterns via similarity enhancements.超级记忆兄弟:通过相似度增强从镜像模式转变为一致模式。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Dec;36(8):1391-402. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.8.1391.
9
Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory.识别记忆中的记忆强度与决策过程。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Mar;35(2):254-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03193446.
10
Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory.情景记忆识别中的词频和词相似度镜像效应。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jun;34(4):826-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03193430.