Verde Michael F, Rotello Caren M
School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Mar;35(2):254-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03193446.
We investigated the role that memory strength plays in the decision process by examining the extent to which strength is used as a cue to dynamically modify recognition criteria. The study list consisted of strong and weak items, with strength a function of study duration or repetition. The recognition test list was divided into two consecutive blocks; strong items appeared in one block, weak items in the other. If the change in item strength across blocks leads to a shift in criterion, the false alarm rate should change accordingly. In four experiments, the false alarm rates did not change across blocks, even when the difference between the strong and the weak items was magnified and marked with semantic cues. However, the strength of the items in the first test block affected the false alarm rate. Thus, strength cues influence initial criterion placement but fail to induce criterion shifts following permanent and even dramatic changes in item strength. These null findings are contrasted with those in a fifth experiment, in which accuracy feedback produced dynamic criterion shifts.
我们通过考察记忆强度作为一种线索来动态修改识别标准的程度,研究了记忆强度在决策过程中所起的作用。研究列表由强项目和弱项目组成,强度是学习持续时间或重复次数的函数。识别测试列表分为两个连续的组块;强项目出现在一个组块中,弱项目出现在另一个组块中。如果跨组块的项目强度变化导致标准的转变,那么误报率应该相应地改变。在四个实验中,即使强项目和弱项目之间的差异被放大并用语义线索标记,误报率在不同组块之间也没有变化。然而,第一个测试组块中项目的强度会影响误报率。因此,强度线索会影响初始标准的设定,但在项目强度发生永久性甚至显著变化后,却无法引发标准的转变。这些无效结果与第五个实验的结果形成对比,在第五个实验中,准确性反馈产生了动态的标准转变。