Shaeffer J, Tegeler J A, Kuban D A, Philput C B, el-Mahdi A M
Department of Radiation Oncology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;24(3):431-4. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)91056-s.
Of 375 patients with prostatic carcinoma treated definitively with radiation therapy at this institution with at least a 5 year follow-up, 23 patients failed locally only, 72 failed with distant metastasis only, 60 had both local and distant failure, while 220 showed no evidence of disease. In search for a possible marker for local failure following radiation therapy, we examined several nuclear morphometric parameters which have been shown to correlate with the biologic aggressiveness of this disease. The 23 locally failed only patients were matched with 23 no evidence of disease patients for stage, grade, treatment modality, prior surgery, age at diagnosis and race. Archival hematoxylin and eosin slides were obtained for 22 of the 23 matched pairs, and morphometric features, including nuclear roundness factor and nuclear area, as well as numbers of nucleoli were assessed using computer-assisted image analysis in both tumor cells and normal prostatic epithelium. Tumor nuclei from the locally failed only patients had significantly higher nuclear roundness factor values (p = 0.0089) compared with tumor cells from no evidence of disease patients. Analysis of these data by clinical stage demonstrated no significant differences between the locally failed only and no evidence of disease patients. Likewise, there were no significant differences in nuclear roundness factor values of locally failed only and no evidence of disease patients with poorly or moderately well-differentiated tumors. However, there was a highly significant difference (p = 0.0012) in the nuclear roundness factor values of locally failed only and no evidence of disease patients with well-differentiated tumors. Thus, there appears to be a subset of patients with well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate who have significantly more irregular tumor nuclei and who fail locally only following definitive radiation therapy.
在本机构接受根治性放射治疗且至少随访5年的375例前列腺癌患者中,23例仅局部复发,72例仅出现远处转移,60例局部和远处均复发,而220例无疾病证据。为了寻找放射治疗后局部复发的可能标志物,我们检查了几个已被证明与该疾病生物学侵袭性相关的核形态计量学参数。将23例仅局部复发的患者与23例无疾病证据的患者在分期、分级、治疗方式、既往手术、诊断时年龄和种族方面进行匹配。从23对匹配病例中的22对获取存档的苏木精和伊红染色切片,使用计算机辅助图像分析评估肿瘤细胞和正常前列腺上皮中的形态计量学特征,包括核圆度因子、核面积以及核仁数量。与无疾病证据患者的肿瘤细胞相比,仅局部复发患者的肿瘤细胞核圆度因子值显著更高(p = 0.0089)。按临床分期对这些数据进行分析表明,仅局部复发患者与无疾病证据患者之间无显著差异。同样,在肿瘤分化差或中等分化的仅局部复发患者与无疾病证据患者的核圆度因子值方面也无显著差异。然而,在肿瘤分化良好的仅局部复发患者与无疾病证据患者的核圆度因子值方面存在高度显著差异(p = 0.0012)。因此,似乎有一部分前列腺高分化腺癌患者的肿瘤细胞核明显更不规则,且仅在接受根治性放射治疗后出现局部复发。