Suppr超能文献

环孢素与泼尼松龙联用对比环孢素、硫唑嘌呤及泼尼松龙用于尸体肾初次移植的随机试验

A randomized trial of cyclosporine and prednisolone versus cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone in primary cadaveric renal transplantation.

作者信息

Lindholm A, Albrechtsen D, Tufveson G, Karlberg I, Persson N H, Groth C G

机构信息

Department of Transplantation Surgery, Huddinge Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Transplantation. 1992 Oct;54(4):624-31. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199210000-00011.

Abstract

A randomized trial was performed with the aim to compare two immunosuppressive treatment schedules in adult recipients of first cadaveric renal transplants. A total of 229 patients were randomized to double therapy with cyclosporine and prednisolone and 234 patients were randomized to triple therapy with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone. Minimum follow-up was 4 years. The actuarial 5-year patient survival was 79.8% in the double therapy group and 82.3% in the triple therapy group (n.s.). The corresponding graft survival figures were 54.4% and 59.6% in the two groups, respectively (n.s.). There were no differences between the groups regarding cause of death or cause of graft loss. Renal function as determined by serum creatinine did not differ between the groups and was stable throughout the observation period. Azathioprine was instituted in a total of 51 patients randomized to double therapy. This subgroup of patients had a patient and graft survival not different from the remaining patients randomized to double therapy or from the patients randomized to triple therapy. There were no differences between the double and triple therapy groups regarding incidence and timing of acute rejection or infections. The incidence of other medical diseases and adverse events such as nephrotoxicity or malignancy did not differ between the groups. Azathioprine-induced leukopenia was uncommon (19 episodes in the triple therapy group). In a multivariate analysis of the whole series the only covariates that significantly influenced graft survival were age of recipient and occurrence of acute rejection, while among other factors treatment schedule did not. Thus this prospective study, in accordance with previous such studies, failed to find support for the use of triple therapy as first choice immunosuppression in first cadaveric renal transplantation. However, the study could not rule out the possibility that some patients at risk for the development of irreversible rejection or nephrotoxicity of CsA might benefit from the addition of azathioprine to the treatment schedule.

摘要

进行了一项随机试验,目的是比较首次尸体肾移植成年受者的两种免疫抑制治疗方案。总共229例患者被随机分配接受环孢素和泼尼松龙的双重治疗,234例患者被随机分配接受环孢素、硫唑嘌呤和泼尼松龙的三重治疗。最短随访时间为4年。双重治疗组的精算5年患者生存率为79.8%,三重治疗组为82.3%(无统计学差异)。两组相应的移植物生存率分别为54.4%和59.6%(无统计学差异)。两组在死亡原因或移植物丢失原因方面没有差异。通过血清肌酐测定的肾功能在两组之间没有差异,并且在整个观察期内保持稳定。共有51例随机分配接受双重治疗的患者使用了硫唑嘌呤。该亚组患者的患者和移植物生存率与其余随机分配接受双重治疗的患者或随机分配接受三重治疗的患者没有差异。双重和三重治疗组在急性排斥反应或感染的发生率和时间方面没有差异。两组在其他内科疾病和不良事件如肾毒性或恶性肿瘤的发生率方面没有差异。硫唑嘌呤引起的白细胞减少并不常见(三重治疗组有19例)。在对整个系列的多变量分析中,唯一显著影响移植物存活的协变量是受者年龄和急性排斥反应的发生,而在其他因素中治疗方案没有影响。因此,这项前瞻性研究与之前的此类研究一致,未能找到支持将三重治疗作为首次尸体肾移植首选免疫抑制方法的依据。然而,该研究不能排除某些有发生不可逆排斥反应或环孢素肾毒性风险的患者可能从治疗方案中添加硫唑嘌呤中获益的可能性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验