AZRIN N H, HAKE D F, HOLZ W C, HUTCHINSON R R
J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Jan;8(1):31-44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-31.
Punishment and escape were studied simultaneously by allowing a subject to escape from a stimulus situation in which responses were punished, into a stimulus situation in which responses were not punished. The frequency of the punished responses was found to be an inverse function of the intensity of punishment, whereas the frequency of the escape response was a direct function of the intensity of punishment. Both of these functions were obtained under three different schedules of food reinforcement. The strength of the escape behavior was evidenced by (1) the emergence of the escape response even when the frequency of food reinforcement decreased as a consequence of the escape response, (2) the maintenance of the escape response by fixed-interval and fixed-ratio schedules of escape reinforcement, and (3) the occurrence of escape responses at intensities of punishment that otherwise produced only mild suppression of the punished response when no escape was possible. This last finding indicates that a subject may be driven out of a situation involving punishment even though the punishment is relatively ineffective in suppressing the punished responses when no escape is possible.
通过让一个受试者从反应会受到惩罚的刺激情境中逃脱到反应不会受到惩罚的刺激情境中,对惩罚和逃脱进行了同时研究。发现受惩罚反应的频率是惩罚强度的反函数,而逃脱反应的频率是惩罚强度的正函数。这两种函数都是在三种不同的食物强化时间表下获得的。逃脱行为的强度通过以下几点得到证明:(1) 即使由于逃脱反应导致食物强化频率降低,逃脱反应仍会出现;(2) 通过固定间隔和固定比率的逃脱强化时间表来维持逃脱反应;(3) 在惩罚强度下会出现逃脱反应,而在无法逃脱时,这种惩罚强度只会对受惩罚反应产生轻微抑制。最后这一发现表明,即使在无法逃脱时惩罚对抑制受惩罚反应相对无效,受试者也可能被驱使逃离涉及惩罚的情境。