Kanter R K, Boeing N M, Hannan W P, Kanter D L
Department of Pediatrics, State University of New York, Health Science Center, Syracuse 13210.
Pediatrics. 1992 Dec;90(6):893-8.
A prospective study was performed to determine whether excess morbidity occurred in critically ill and injured pediatric patients during interhospital transport compared with morbidity in a control group. Control observations were made during the first 2 hours of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) care of patients emergently admitted from within the same institution and not requiring interhospital transport. The first 2 PICU hours of control patients corresponded to the interval of transport in those who required interhospital transfer. Transport care was provided by nonspecialized teams from referring hospitals. Morbidity occurred in 20.9% of 177 transported patients, exceeding the morbidity rate of 11.3% in 195 control patients (P < .05). The difference in morbidity was due to intensive care-related adverse events (eg, plugged or dislodged endotracheal tubes, loss of intravenous access) in 15.3% and 3.6% of transported and control patients, respectively (P < .05). Physiologic deterioration occurred at similar rates of 7.9% and 8.7% in transported and control patients, respectively (P > .05). Slightly greater pre-ICU severity of illness in transported than control patients (median Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score = 10 and 7, respectively, P < .05) and greater pre-ICU therapy relative to severity (P < .05) in control patients are potential confounding sources of the morbidity differences. If patients are stratified into subgroups of similar pre-ICU severity, an excess of intensive care-related adverse events in transported patients remains evident in the severe subgroup (P < .05). Further investigation is warranted to determine whether specialized transport teams can reduce the excess morbidity associated with interhospital transport of critically ill and injured pediatric patients.
开展了一项前瞻性研究,以确定危重症及受伤儿科患者在院际转运期间的发病率是否高于对照组。对照组观察对象为同一机构内紧急入院且无需院际转运的患者在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)接受治疗的前2小时。对照组患者在PICU的前2小时相当于需要院际转运患者的转运时间段。转运护理由转诊医院的非专业团队提供。177例转运患者中有20.9%发生了不良事件,超过了195例对照患者11.3%的发病率(P < 0.05)。发病率差异是由于转运患者和对照患者中分别有15.3%和3.6%发生了与重症监护相关的不良事件(如气管内插管堵塞或移位、静脉通路丧失)(P < 0.05)。转运患者和对照患者生理状况恶化的发生率分别为7.9%和8.7%,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。转运患者在进入ICU前的疾病严重程度略高于对照患者(儿科死亡风险评分中位数分别为10和7,P < 0.05),且对照患者相对于疾病严重程度而言在进入ICU前接受的治疗更多(P < 0.05),这些可能是导致发病率差异的潜在混杂因素。如果将患者按进入ICU前严重程度相似的亚组进行分层,在严重亚组中,转运患者与重症监护相关的不良事件仍然明显过多(P < 0.05)。有必要进一步研究以确定专业转运团队是否能够降低危重症及受伤儿科患者院际转运相关的过多发病率。