Paradis D, Vallée F, Allard S, Bisson C, Daviau N, Drapeau C, Auger F, LeBel M
Laboratoire de Pharmacocinétique Clinique, Ecole de Pharmacie, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Oct;36(10):2085-92. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.10.2085.
We compared the pharmacokinetics and the serum bactericidal activities of cefpirome, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, and ciprofloxacin. Fifteen healthy volunteers received 1 g of cefpirome, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone intravenously, 500 mg of imipenem-cilastatin intravenously, and 500 mg of ciprofloxacin orally. High-performance liquid chromatographic assays were used to quantitate unchanged antibiotic in plasma and urine. Serum bactericidal activities were determined against six clinical isolates each of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter cloacae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa by using a modified microdilution method of Reller and Stratton (L. B. Reller and C. W. Stratton, J. Infect. Dis. 136:196-204, 1977). Overall, cefpirome exhibited pharmacokinetics similar to those of ceftazidime: half-life (t1/2), 1.95 h; concentration at 1 h (C1h), 47 to 49 micrograms/ml for both antibiotics. Ceftriaxone displayed the longest t1/2 (7.65 h) and the highest C1h (137.8 micrograms/ml), while we observed the shortest t1/2 (1.05 h) and the lowest C1h (19.85 micrograms/ml) with imipenem. At 1 h, cefpirome and, even more so, imipenem showed significantly better serum bactericidal activities against S. aureus (1:273 and 1:80) than did the other antibiotics (P less than 0.0005; analysis of variance with randomized block design and Bonferroni correction). Against E. cloacae, we observed the highest serum bactericidal titers at 1 h with cefpirome, and this superiority vis-à-vis the other antibiotics tested was maintained for up to 8 h after dosing. Ceftazidime remained the most active agent tested against P. aeruginosa (serum bactericidal activity titers, 1:43 at 1 h) up to 8 h. In summary, the study showed that cefpirome and imipenem provide more potent serum bactericidal activities than do broad-spectrum cephalosporins against S. aureus; thus, both of these antibiotics should be adequate against serious S. aureus infections. In addition, cefpirome appears to be a promising alternative for treatment of infections caused by E. cloacae and P. aeruginosa.
我们比较了头孢匹罗、头孢他啶、头孢曲松、亚胺培南和环丙沙星的药代动力学及血清杀菌活性。15名健康志愿者静脉注射1g头孢匹罗、头孢他啶和头孢曲松,静脉注射500mg亚胺培南-西司他丁,口服500mg环丙沙星。采用高效液相色谱法测定血浆和尿液中未变化的抗生素含量。通过使用Reller和Stratton改良的微量稀释法(L.B.Reller和C.W.Stratton,《传染病杂志》136:196 - 204,1977年),测定针对金黄色葡萄球菌、阴沟肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌各6株临床分离株的血清杀菌活性。总体而言,头孢匹罗的药代动力学与头孢他啶相似:半衰期(t1/2)为1.95小时;两种抗生素在1小时时的浓度(C1h)为47至49μg/ml。头孢曲松的t1/2最长(7.65小时),C1h最高(137.8μg/ml),而亚胺培南的t1/2最短(1.05小时),C1h最低(19.85μg/ml)。在1小时时,头孢匹罗,尤其是亚胺培南对金黄色葡萄球菌的血清杀菌活性(分别为1:273和1:80)显著优于其他抗生素(P<0.0005;采用随机区组设计和Bonferroni校正的方差分析)。对于阴沟肠杆菌,在给药后1小时,头孢匹罗的血清杀菌效价最高,且相对于其他受试抗生素,这种优势在给药后长达8小时内一直保持。头孢他啶在长达8小时内仍是针对铜绿假单胞菌测试的最具活性的药物(血清杀菌活性效价在1小时时为1:43)。总之,该研究表明,与广谱头孢菌素相比,头孢匹罗和亚胺培南对金黄色葡萄球菌具有更强的血清杀菌活性;因此,这两种抗生素都应足以治疗严重的金黄色葡萄球菌感染。此外,头孢匹罗似乎是治疗由阴沟肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌引起的感染的一种有前景的替代药物。