Rizzo R J, Whittemore A D, Couper G S, Donaldson M C, Aranki S F, Collins J J, Mannick J A, Cohn L H
Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1992 Dec;54(6):1099-108; discussion 1108-9. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)90076-g.
The timing of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary revascularization (CABG) for concomitant disease is controversial. Results of combined CEA/CABG in 127 patients (age range, 46 to 82 years; mean age, 65 years; 61% male) from 1978 to 1991 were reviewed. Ninety-five patients (75%) were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, 48 (38%) had left main coronary artery disease, and 32 (28%) had depressed ejection fraction ( < 0.50). Forty (32%) had asymptomatic bruits, 61 (48%) transient ischemic attacks, and 26 (20%) prior strokes. Seventy-five (59%) had bilateral carotid stenosis, including 20 (16%) with contralateral occlusions. Perioperative mortality was 7 of 127 (5.5%), and all deaths were cardiac related. Myocardial infarctions occurred in 6 of 127 patients (4.7%) and were nonfatal in 3 (2.3%). Permanent strokes occurred in 7 of 127 (5.5%) and were ipsilateral in 5 (3.9%). Perioperative stroke did not occur in the asymptomatic group, but the risk was higher in those with prior stroke (19%) or with contralateral carotid occlusion (15%). The stroke risk for our patients with carotid disease having CABG without CEA is not known, but the literature reports rates as high as 14%. For our patients without known concomitant disease, the risk of permanent stroke was 1.0% (31/3012) for isolated CABG and 1.5% (7/482) for isolated CEA. The late results after CEA/CABG revealed a 5-year survival of 70% +/- 5%, which correlated with ejection fraction ( > or = 0.50, 81% +/- 5%; < 0.50, 45% +/- 11%; p < 0.003). Freedom from late permanent ipsilateral stroke was 97% +/- 2% at 8 years. Freedom from stroke at 5 years was lower among patients with a previous stroke (71% +/- 10%) compared with transiently symptomatic (90% +/- 4%) and asymptomatic (96% +/- 4%) patients (p < 0.03). Combined CEA/CABG is a useful option in this high-risk group of patients with extensive atherosclerosis; avoids a subsequent hospitalization, anesthetic, and delay period; and provides long-term protection from ipsilateral stroke.
对于合并疾病患者,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和冠状动脉血运重建术(CABG)的手术时机存在争议。回顾了1978年至1991年期间127例患者(年龄范围46至82岁;平均年龄65岁;61%为男性)行CEA/CABG联合手术的结果。95例患者(75%)属于纽约心脏协会功能分级III或IV级,48例(38%)患有左主干冠状动脉疾病,32例(28%)射血分数降低(<0.50)。40例(32%)有无症状性杂音,61例(48%)有短暂性脑缺血发作,26例(20%)既往有中风史。75例(59%)有双侧颈动脉狭窄,其中20例(16%)对侧闭塞。围手术期死亡率为127例中的7例(5.5%),所有死亡均与心脏相关。127例患者中有6例(4.7%)发生心肌梗死,其中3例(2.3%)为非致命性。127例中有7例(5.5%)发生永久性中风,其中5例(3.9%)为同侧中风。无症状组未发生围手术期中风,但既往有中风史(19%)或对侧颈动脉闭塞(15%)的患者中风风险更高。对于我们患有颈动脉疾病且行CABG而未行CEA的患者,中风风险尚不清楚,但文献报道发生率高达14%。对于我们无已知合并疾病的患者,单纯CABG的永久性中风风险为1.0%(31/3012),单纯CEA为1.5%(7/482)。CEA/CABG术后的远期结果显示5年生存率为70%±5%,这与射血分数相关(≥0.50,81%±5%;<0.50,45%±11%;p<0.003)。8年时同侧无晚期永久性中风的生存率为97%±2%。与短暂性症状性患者(90%±4%)和无症状患者(96%±4%)相比,既往有中风史的患者5年无中风生存率较低(71%±10%)(p<0.03)。CEA/CABG联合手术对于这类患有广泛动脉粥样硬化的高危患者是一种有用的选择;避免了后续的住院、麻醉和延迟期;并提供了对同侧中风的长期保护。