Timperley J, Bannister G, Gie G, Ring P, Ling R
Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Hospital, Exeter, UK.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1992;111(6):301-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00420054.
Two series of implanted conical, polyethylene Ring cups were studied clinically and radiographically. In one series the cups were uncemented while in the second cement was used. The results using cemented conical cups were then compared with results using a cemented cup of hemispherical design to study the effect of cup geometry. At 7-8 years a total of 3.8% of the cemented conical series and 2.9% of the uncemented were revised for aseptic loosening. At 9 years survivorship was identical. Migration of the sockets occurred in approximately 25% of both series and was directly related to cup cover of less than 80% (P < 0.001). The series of cemented hemispherical cups were reviewed after an identical period. Although the numbers revised for loosening were comparable in this and the cemented conical group, radiological migration was statistically greater in the latter (P < 0.001). Alternative methods of socket preparation and cement technique were thought to be the most likely explanation for the observed differences.
对两组植入的圆锥形聚乙烯环形髋臼杯进行了临床和影像学研究。一组髋臼杯未使用骨水泥,另一组使用了骨水泥。然后将使用骨水泥固定的圆锥形髋臼杯的结果与使用半球形设计的骨水泥固定杯的结果进行比较,以研究髋臼杯几何形状的影响。在7至8年时,骨水泥固定的圆锥形髋臼杯组中有3.8%、未使用骨水泥组中有2.9%因无菌性松动而进行了翻修。在9年时,两组的生存率相同。两组中约25%的髋臼出现了移位,且与髋臼覆盖率小于80%直接相关(P < 0.001)。在相同时间段后,对骨水泥固定的半球形髋臼杯组进行了评估。尽管该组和骨水泥固定的圆锥形髋臼杯组因松动而进行翻修的数量相当,但后者的放射学移位在统计学上更大(P < 0.001)。髋臼准备的替代方法和骨水泥技术被认为是观察到的差异的最可能解释。