Holmberg Eva B, Doyle Patricia, Perkell Joseph S, Hammarberg Britta, Hillman Robert E
Karolinska Institute, Department of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Voice. 2003 Sep;17(3):269-82. doi: 10.1067/s0892-1997(03)00076-6.
An important clinical issue concerns the efficacy of current voice therapy approaches in treating voice disorders, such as vocal nodules. Much research focuses on finding reliable methods for documentation of treatment results. In this second treatment study of ten patients with vocal nodules, who participated in a behaviorally based voice therapy program, 11 aerodynamic (transglottal air pressure and glottal waveform) and acoustic (spl, f0, and spectrum slope) measures were used. Three pretherapy baseline assessments were carried out, followed by one assessment after each of five therapy phases. Measurements were made of two types of speech materials: Strings of repeated /pae/ syllables and sustained /ae/ phonations in two loudness conditions: comfortable loudness and loud voice. The data were normalized using z-scores, which were based on data from 22 normal subjects. The results showed that the aerodynamic measures reflected the presence of vocal pathology to a higher degree than did the acoustic spectral measures, and they should be useful in studies comparing nodule and normal voice production. Large individual session-to-session variation was found for all measures across pretherapy baseline recordings, which contributed to nonsignificant differences between baseline and therapy data.
一个重要的临床问题涉及当前嗓音治疗方法在治疗嗓音障碍(如声带小结)方面的疗效。许多研究致力于寻找记录治疗结果的可靠方法。在这项针对10名声带小结患者的第二项治疗研究中,这些患者参加了基于行为的嗓音治疗项目,使用了11种空气动力学(声门下气压和声门波形)和声学(声压级、基频和频谱斜率)测量方法。在治疗前进行了三次基线评估,然后在五个治疗阶段的每个阶段之后各进行一次评估。对两种类型的言语材料进行了测量:重复/pae/音节串以及在舒适响度和大声两种响度条件下的持续/ae/发声。数据使用基于22名正常受试者数据的z分数进行了标准化。结果表明,空气动力学测量比声学频谱测量更能反映嗓音病理状况的存在,并且它们在比较小结嗓音和正常嗓音发声的研究中应会很有用。在治疗前基线记录中,所有测量都发现了较大的个体间差异,这导致了基线数据和治疗数据之间无显著差异。