Bellezza Francis S
Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, US.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):779-96. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.779.
Six multinomial processing-tree models (W. H. Batchelder & D. M. Riefer, 1999), which include parameters representing conscious and unconscious memory processes, were tested using the recall-recognition paradigm. Data from 2 experiments were fit equally well by 3 of the 6 models. One model recognition was an extension of the generate-recognize model (L. L. Jacoby, 1998), and another was an extension of the non-high-threshold model (D. M. McBride & B. A. Dosher, 1999). The 3rd model was the source evaluation model (D. M. McBride & B. A. Dosher, 1999). Values of the parameters of 2 of these 3 models, excepting the non-high-threshold model, responded to experimental manipulations in accordance with the meaning of the parameters. The equivalence of models with regard to goodness-of-fit tests is discussed as is how experiments can be designed to demonstrate the superiority of one model over another. The potential usefulness of these models in the study of amnesia is considered.
六个多项式加工树模型(W. H. 巴彻尔德和D. M. 里弗,1999),其中包括代表有意识和无意识记忆过程的参数,使用回忆-识别范式进行了测试。来自2个实验的数据与6个模型中的3个拟合得同样好。一个模型识别是生成-识别模型(L. L. 雅各比,1998)的扩展,另一个是非高阈值模型(D. M. 麦克布赖德和B. A. 多舍尔,1999)的扩展。第三个模型是源评估模型(D. M. 麦克布赖德和B. A. 多舍尔,1999)。这3个模型中的2个(非高阈值模型除外)的参数值根据参数的含义对实验操作做出了反应。讨论了模型在拟合优度检验方面的等效性,以及如何设计实验来证明一个模型优于另一个模型。还考虑了这些模型在失忆症研究中的潜在用途。