• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《长处与困难问卷》瑞典语版(SDQ-Swe)的效度

Validity of the Swedish version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Swe).

作者信息

Malmberg Mikael, Rydell Ann-Margret, Smedje Hans

机构信息

Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinic, Hospital of Hälsingland, Söderhamn, Sweden.

出版信息

Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57(5):357-63. doi: 10.1080/08039480310002697.

DOI:10.1080/08039480310002697
PMID:14522609
Abstract

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is an internationally widely used, brief screening instrument for mental health problems in children and teenagers. The SDQ probes behaviours and psychological attributes reflecting the child's difficulties as well as strengths, and targets hyperactivity/inattention, emotional symptoms, conduct problems, peer problems and prosocial behaviour. Also, the instrument taps the impact aspect, i.e. whether the child is judged to suffer from emotional or behavioural problems severe enough to cause distress or social impairment. Studies of the original English SDQ, as well as of translations into several other languages, attest to a compelling usefulness and validity of the instrument. In this investigation, the adequacy of the Swedish adaptation of the SDQ (SDQ-Swe) was tested in comparisons between parent reports on 5-15-year-old children drawn from a community sample (n=263) and from a child psychiatric sample (n=230). Results showed that the instrument differentiated well between the community and the psychiatric samples, the latter displaying more symptoms, fewer strengths and more social impairment. Moreover, ROC analyses showed satisfactory sensitivity and specificity of the principal scales of the SDQ-Swe at proposed cut-offs. Hence, results showed adequate validity of the SDQ-Swe, suggesting that this new instrument, an instrument in tune with the ideas of contemporary child psychiatry and psychology, is a useful tool for mental health screening in children and adolescents.

摘要

优势与困难问卷(SDQ)是一种在国际上广泛使用的、用于筛查儿童和青少年心理健康问题的简短工具。SDQ探究反映儿童困难及优势的行为和心理特质,涉及多动/注意力不集中、情绪症状、品行问题、同伴问题和亲社会行为。此外,该工具还涉及影响方面,即判断儿童是否患有严重到足以导致痛苦或社会功能受损的情绪或行为问题。对原始英文SDQ以及翻译成其他几种语言后的研究,都证明了该工具具有令人信服的实用性和有效性。在这项调查中,通过比较来自社区样本(n = 263)和儿童精神病样本(n = 230)的5至15岁儿童的家长报告,测试了瑞典语版SDQ(SDQ-Swe)的适用性。结果表明,该工具在社区样本和精神病样本之间有良好区分度,后者表现出更多症状、更少优势和更多社会功能受损情况。此外,ROC分析表明,在建议的临界值下,SDQ-Swe主要量表具有令人满意的敏感性和特异性。因此,结果显示SDQ-Swe具有足够的有效性,表明这种符合当代儿童精神病学和心理学理念的新工具,是儿童和青少年心理健康筛查的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Validity of the Swedish version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Swe).《长处与困难问卷》瑞典语版(SDQ-Swe)的效度
Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57(5):357-63. doi: 10.1080/08039480310002697.
2
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)--further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents.长处与困难问卷(SDQ)——关于其在荷兰儿童和青少年社区样本中的信度和效度的进一步证据。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;12(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00787-003-0298-2.
3
The Strengths and Difficulties Self-Report Questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community samples.作为挪威社区样本筛查工具的优势与困难自评问卷。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;13(2):73-82. doi: 10.1007/s00787-004-0356-4.
4
Scale properties of the Japanese version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): a study of infant and school children in community samples.日本版优势与困难问卷(SDQ)的量表特性:社区样本中婴幼儿及学龄儿童的研究
Brain Dev. 2008 Jun;30(6):410-5. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2007.12.003. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
5
Self-reported emotional and behavioral problems in Swedish 14 to 15-year-old adolescents: a study with the self-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.瑞典14至15岁青少年自我报告的情绪和行为问题:一项使用优势与困难问卷自评版的研究。
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Dec;49(6):523-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00668.x. Epub 2008 May 16.
6
Chronic physical illness and mental health in children. Results from a large-scale population study.儿童慢性身体疾病与心理健康。一项大规模人群研究的结果。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;48(8):785-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01755.x.
7
Construct validity of the five-factor Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence.五因素优势与困难问卷(SDQ)在青春期前、青春期早期和晚期的结构效度。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;49(12):1304-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01942.x.
8
[Screening childhood behavior problems using short questionnaires I.: the Hungarian version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire].[使用简短问卷筛查儿童行为问题I:优势与困难问卷的匈牙利语版本]
Psychiatr Hung. 2008;23(5):358-65.
9
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study of a new computer version of the self-report scale.长处与困难问卷:自我报告量表新电脑版本的一项初步研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;12(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s00787-003-0303-9.
10
Normative data and scale properties of the German parent SDQ.德国版父母版优势与困难问卷的常模数据及量表特性
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;13 Suppl 2:II3-10. doi: 10.1007/s00787-004-2002-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Teenagers and Young Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Study Approach and Baseline Characteristics.青少年及青年人工耳蜗植入者:一项多学科随访研究方法及基线特征
Audiol Res. 2025 Feb 12;15(1):16. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15010016.
2
Short-term mentalization-based therapy for common childhood mental disorders - a pilot quasi-randomised controlled trial.针对常见儿童精神障碍的短期基于心理化的治疗——一项试点半随机对照试验。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;30(2):436-451. doi: 10.1177/13591045251316619. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
Prenatal exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals and the association with behavioural difficulties in 7-year-old children in the SELMA study.
SELMA研究中孕期暴露于内分泌干扰化学物质及其与7岁儿童行为问题的关联。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 19. doi: 10.1038/s41370-024-00739-x.
4
Neuropsychological profile in young girls at high risk of developing anorexia nervosa.有患神经性厌食症高风险的年轻女孩的神经心理学特征。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2025 Mar;33(2):411-425. doi: 10.1002/erv.3151. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
5
Mental and physical health in children of women with a history of anorexia nervosa.患有神经性厌食症女性的子女的精神和身体健康。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;33(10):3481-3493. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02393-y. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
6
Are the estimated needs for mental health care among adolescents from different socioeconomic backgrounds met equally in Sweden? A longitudinal survey-registry linkage study.瑞典不同社会经济背景的青少年对精神卫生保健的需求估计是否得到平等满足?一项纵向调查-登记关联研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;33(8):2581-2591. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02341-2. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
7
Screening Children in India: Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status and the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire.印度儿童筛查:《父母对发育状况的评估及长处与困难问卷》的翻译与心理测量学评估
Pediatr Rep. 2023 Dec 14;15(4):750-765. doi: 10.3390/pediatric15040067.
8
Association Between Intellectual Functioning and Autistic Traits in the General Population of Children.儿童普通人群中智力功能与自闭症特质之间的关联
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Feb;56(1):264-275. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01562-5. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
9
Moderators of long-term treatment outcome when comparing two group interventions for adolescents with ADHD: who benefits more from DBT-based skills training?比较两种 ADHD 青少年团体干预措施的长期治疗结果的调节因素:谁从基于 DBT 的技能训练中获益更多?
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 6;22(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04435-8.
10
The ESSENCE-Questionnaire in Medical Records Screening for Neurodevelopmental Symptoms/Problems: Utility and Clinical Validity.用于筛查神经发育症状/问题的病历中的本质问卷:效用与临床效度
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 Nov 3;18:2559-2574. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S367196. eCollection 2022.