Walsh Catherine, Ross Lainie F
Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Pediatrics. 2003 Oct;112(4):890-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.4.890.
There is extensive documentation that minority adults are underrepresented in medical research, but there are scant data regarding minority children and their parents.
All full-length articles published in the paper edition of 3 general pediatric journals between July 1999 and June 2000 were collected and reviewed. Articles were excluded when they did not include at least 1 US researcher, all subjects at US institutions, parents or children as subjects, some prospective data collection, or between 8 and 10 000 subjects. We recorded the number and race/ethnicity (R/E) of all subjects, the type of research, and the type of data collected. Corresponding authors were surveyed to clarify R/E data.
A total of 192 studies qualified. R/E data were reported in 114 (59%) studies, and survey data provided additional or new information in 25 studies resulting in R/E data in 128 (67%) articles accounting for 75% of the subjects. R/E was described by >10 different labels. There was an overrepresentation of black subjects and an underrepresentation of white and Hispanic subjects compared with the census data. When compared with research participation of child subjects, generally, black children were overrepresented and Hispanic children were underrepresented in clinical trials, and both were underrepresented in therapeutic research. Black and Hispanic children were overrepresented in potentially stigmatizing research.
Overall, we found an overrepresentation of black subjects and an underrepresentation of white and Hispanic subjects with significant variations depending on the type of research.
有大量文献表明少数族裔成年人在医学研究中的代表性不足,但关于少数族裔儿童及其父母的数据却很少。
收集并审查了1999年7月至2000年6月期间在3种普通儿科期刊纸质版上发表的所有全文文章。如果文章不包括至少1名美国研究人员、美国机构的所有受试者、作为受试者的父母或儿童、一些前瞻性数据收集,或者受试者数量在8至10000人之间,则将其排除。我们记录了所有受试者的数量和种族/族裔(R/E)、研究类型以及收集的数据类型。对通讯作者进行了调查以澄清R/E数据。
共有192项研究符合条件。114项(59%)研究报告了R/E数据,25项研究的调查数据提供了额外或新的信息,从而使128篇(67%)文章中有R/E数据,占受试者的75%。R/E用超过10种不同的标签来描述。与人口普查数据相比,黑人受试者的代表性过高,白人和西班牙裔受试者的代表性不足。与儿童受试者的研究参与情况相比,一般来说,黑人儿童在临床试验中的代表性过高,西班牙裔儿童的代表性不足,而两者在治疗性研究中的代表性均不足。黑人和西班牙裔儿童在可能带有污名化的研究中的代表性过高。
总体而言,我们发现黑人受试者的代表性过高,白人和西班牙裔受试者的代表性不足,且根据研究类型存在显著差异。