Suppr超能文献

收集和使用人口统计学数据的伦理和社会正义方法:对心理研究人员的建议。

An Ethics and Social-Justice Approach to Collecting and Using Demographic Data for Psychological Researchers.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh.

Department of Psychology, Harvard University.

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;18(5):979-995. doi: 10.1177/17456916221137350. Epub 2022 Dec 2.

Abstract

The collection and use of demographic data in psychological sciences has the potential to aid in transforming inequities brought about by unjust social conditions toward equity. However, many current methods surrounding demographic data do not achieve this goal. Some methods function to reduce, but not eliminate, inequities, whereas others may perpetuate harmful stereotypes, invalidate minoritized identities, and exclude key groups from research participation or access to disseminated findings. In this article, we aim to (a) review key ethical and social-justice dilemmas inherent to working with demographic data in psychological research and (b) introduce a framework positioned in ethics and social justice to help psychologists and researchers in social-science fields make thoughtful decisions about the collection and use of demographic data. Although demographic data methods vary across subdisciplines and research topics, we assert that these core issues-and solutions-are relevant to all research within the psychological sciences, including basic and applied research. Our overarching aim is to support key stakeholders in psychology (e.g., researchers, funding agencies, journal editors, peer reviewers) in making ethical and socially-just decisions about the collection, analysis, reporting, interpretation, and dissemination of demographic data.

摘要

在心理科学中收集和使用人口统计学数据有可能帮助将不公正的社会条件造成的不平等转化为公平。然而,目前许多围绕人口统计学数据的方法并没有实现这一目标。一些方法可以减少不平等,但不能消除不平等,而另一些方法可能会延续有害的刻板印象,使少数群体的身份无效,并将关键群体排除在研究参与或传播研究结果之外。在本文中,我们旨在(a)审查在心理研究中使用人口统计学数据所固有的关键伦理和社会公正难题,以及(b)介绍一个以伦理和社会公正为定位的框架,以帮助心理学家和社会科学领域的研究人员就人口统计学数据的收集和使用做出深思熟虑的决策。尽管人口统计学数据方法因子学科和研究课题而异,但我们断言,这些核心问题和解决方案与心理科学中的所有研究都有关,包括基础研究和应用研究。我们的总体目标是支持心理学中的主要利益相关者(例如,研究人员、资助机构、期刊编辑、同行评审员)在人口统计学数据的收集、分析、报告、解释和传播方面做出合乎道德和公正的决策。

相似文献

1
An Ethics and Social-Justice Approach to Collecting and Using Demographic Data for Psychological Researchers.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;18(5):979-995. doi: 10.1177/17456916221137350. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
3
Psychology and social justice: why we do what we do.
Am Psychol. 2012 Jul-Aug;67(5):337-46. doi: 10.1037/a0029232.
4
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Action against inequalities: a synthesis of social justice & equity, diversity, inclusion frameworks.
Int J Equity Health. 2024 May 23;23(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02141-3.
7
A multidimensional account of social justice for global health research.
Bioethics. 2023 Sep;37(7):624-636. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13186. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
8
The contribution of the nursing profession to the establishment of social justice: A grounded theory study.
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Aug;31(5):759-776. doi: 10.1177/09697330231200566. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
9
When the political is professional: Civil disobedience in psychology.
Am Psychol. 2021 Nov;76(8):1217-1231. doi: 10.1037/amp0000867.
10
Advancing Action on Health Equity Through a Sociolegal Model of Health.
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):904-927. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12539. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

3
Bioethical and critical consciousness in clinical translational neuroscience.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 22;9(1):e37. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.5. eCollection 2025.
5
Equity in Digital Mental Health Interventions in the United States: Where to Next?
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 24;26:e59939. doi: 10.2196/59939.
6
A scoping review of undergraduate anatomy and physiology education: approaches to evaluating student outcomes in the United States.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024 Aug 29;25(2):e0001124. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00011-24. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
10
Best Practices and Methodological Strategies for Addressing Generalizability in Neuropsychological Assessment.
J Pediatr Neuropsychol. 2023;9(2):47-63. doi: 10.1007/s40817-023-00145-5. Epub 2023 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychology's Contributions to Anti-Blackness in the United States Within Psychological Research, Criminal Justice, and Mental Health.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Nov;18(6):1282-1305. doi: 10.1177/17456916221141374. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
4
Open science and multicultural research: Some data, considerations, and recommendations.
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2022 Oct;28(4):567-586. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000541. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
5
Middle Eastern and North African Americans may not be perceived, nor perceive themselves, to be White.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 15;119(7). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117940119.
7
Conceptualizing, Contextualizing, and Operationalizing Race in Quantitative Health Sciences Research.
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;20(2):157-163. doi: 10.1370/afm.2792. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
8
Neuropsychology's race problem does not begin or end with demographically adjusted norms.
Nat Rev Neurol. 2022 Mar;18(3):125-126. doi: 10.1038/s41582-021-00607-4.
9
Participatory science as a decolonizing methodology: Leveraging collective knowledge from partnerships with refugee and immigrant communities.
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2022 Jul;28(3):299-305. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000514. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验