Feldman Deborah M, Borgida Adam F, Rodis John F, Leo Mauro V, Campbell Winston A
University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;189(3):710-3. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00659-8.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of two different misoprostol regimens for second-trimester pregnancy termination.
We performed a randomized clinical trial in patients who were at 14 to 23 weeks of gestation and who were admitted for medical termination of pregnancy. All patients received 800 microg of vaginal misoprostol and were assigned randomly to 400 microg of oral misoprostol or 400 microg of vaginal misoprostol every 8 hours. Efficacy and side effects were compared. The mean induction time of the study group was compared with that of an historic control group that had received 400 microg vaginally every 12 hours.
Forty-three women were assigned randomly, 22 women to vaginal misoprostol and 21 women to oral misoprostol. Induction time and hospital stay were slightly shorter for the oral group; however, the differences were not significant. Side effects were similar for both groups.
After an initial 800 microg dose of vaginal misoprostol, a regimen of 400 microg of oral misoprostol every 8 hours is as effective as the same dose of vaginal misoprostol with no additional side effects, which provides a convenient alternative for midtrimester pregnancy termination.
本研究旨在比较两种不同米索前列醇方案用于孕中期引产的疗效及副作用。
我们对妊娠14至23周且因药物引产入院的患者进行了一项随机临床试验。所有患者均接受800微克阴道米索前列醇,并被随机分配至每8小时口服400微克米索前列醇组或每8小时阴道给予400微克米索前列醇组。比较两组的疗效及副作用。将研究组的平均引产时间与每12小时阴道给予400微克米索前列醇的历史对照组进行比较。
43名女性被随机分组,22名女性接受阴道米索前列醇,21名女性接受口服米索前列醇。口服组的引产时间和住院时间略短;然而,差异无统计学意义。两组的副作用相似。
在初始给予800微克阴道米索前列醇后,每8小时口服400微克米索前列醇的方案与相同剂量的阴道米索前列醇效果相同,且无额外副作用,为孕中期引产提供了一种方便的替代方法。