• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用临终关怀服务的家庭满意度:临终关怀行业当前的成就与挑战

Satisfaction of families using end-of-life care: current successes and challenges in the hospice industry.

作者信息

Miceli Penny J, Mylod Deirdre E

机构信息

Research and Development Department, Press Ganey Associates, Inc., South Bend, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2003 Sep-Oct;20(5):360-70. doi: 10.1177/104990910302000510.

DOI:10.1177/104990910302000510
PMID:14529039
Abstract

This study examined the satisfaction of family members with the end-of-life care their loved ones received. Data were collected from 1,839 individuals receiving care from 17 different care agencies nationwide. Although family satisfaction with hospice care was generally quite high. situational factors played a role. The timing of the referral was critical, with families rating services lower almost across the board when the referral to hospice was deemed "too late." Additionally, families expressed greater satisfaction when the patient's care was overseen by the hospice director, rather than a personal physician. Each of these findings has important implications for physicians, patients, and families as they begin to plan for end-of-life care.

摘要

本研究调查了家庭成员对其亲人所接受的临终关怀服务的满意度。数据收集自全国17家不同护理机构的1839名接受护理的人员。尽管家庭成员对临终关怀服务的总体满意度相当高,但情境因素也起到了一定作用。转诊时机至关重要,当临终关怀转诊被认为“太晚”时,家庭成员对服务的评分几乎普遍较低。此外,当患者的护理由临终关怀主任而非私人医生监督时,家庭成员表示更满意。这些研究结果对医生、患者及其家属在开始规划临终关怀时均具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Satisfaction of families using end-of-life care: current successes and challenges in the hospice industry.使用临终关怀服务的家庭满意度:临终关怀行业当前的成就与挑战
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2003 Sep-Oct;20(5):360-70. doi: 10.1177/104990910302000510.
2
Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.家属对临终关怀最后场所的看法。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88.
3
Patient and caregiver satisfaction with end-of-life care: does high satisfaction mean high quality of care?患者及照护者对临终关怀的满意度:高满意度是否意味着高质量的照护?
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2002 Jan-Feb;19(1):19-27. doi: 10.1177/104990910201900106.
4
Late referral to hospice and bereaved family member perception of quality of end-of-life care.晚期转介至临终关怀机构及丧亲家庭成员对临终护理质量的看法。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Nov;30(5):400-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.04.013.
5
Revisiting perceptions of quality of hospice care: managing for the ultimate referral.重新审视对临终关怀质量的认知:为最终转诊进行管理。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014 Aug;31(5):521-6. doi: 10.1177/1049909113499441. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
6
Reach for the Stars.追求卓越。
Home Healthc Now. 2018 May/Jun;36(3):185-188. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000654.
7
Quality of end-of-life care for cancer patients: does home hospice care matter?癌症患者临终关怀的质量:居家临终关怀重要吗?
Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(12):988-92.
8
Characteristics of dementia end-of-life care across care settings.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2003 May-Jun;20(3):191-200. doi: 10.1177/104990910302000307.
9
It is "too late" or is it? Bereaved family member perceptions of hospice referral when their family member was on hospice for seven days or less.当患者在临终关怀机构接受治疗的时间不足七天时,其家属对临终关怀转诊的看法:为时已晚还是为时未晚?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Apr;43(4):732-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.05.012. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
10
A comparison of the quality of care provided to cancer patients in the UK in the last three months of life in in-patient hospices compared with hospitals, from the perspective of bereaved relatives: results from a survey using the VOICES questionnaire.从临终关怀医院和医院中接受治疗的癌症患者在生命的最后三个月内所接受的护理质量比较:使用 VOICES 问卷进行调查的结果,从失去亲人的亲属的角度来看。
Palliat Med. 2009 Apr;23(3):190-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216309102525. Epub 2009 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Health and Palliative Care.公共卫生与姑息治疗。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2023 Aug;39(3):395-406. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 May 15.
2
Differences of Quality in End-of-Life Care across Settings: Results from the U.S. National Health and Aging Trends Study of Medicare Beneficiaries.不同环境下临终关怀的质量差异:来自美国 Medicare 受益人的国家健康老龄化趋势研究的结果。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;23(9):1198-1203. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0297. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
3
Hospice Use Among Patients with Heart Failure.心力衰竭患者临终关怀的使用情况。
Card Fail Rev. 2019 May 24;5(2):93-98. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2019.2.2. eCollection 2019 May.
4
Missed Opportunity: Hospice Care and the Family.错失的机会:临终关怀与家庭
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2015;11(3-4):224-43. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2015.1108896.
5
Predictors of Preference for Hospice Care Among Diverse Older Adults.不同老年人群中临终关怀偏好的预测因素
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 Jul;33(6):574-84. doi: 10.1177/1049909115593936. Epub 2015 Jul 12.
6
Correlates of a good death and the impact of hospice involvement: findings from the national survey of households affected by cancer.善终的相关因素及临终关怀参与的影响:受癌症影响家庭全国性调查的结果
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Mar;23(3):809-18. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2404-z. Epub 2014 Sep 7.
7
Timing of Hospice Referral: Assessing Satisfaction While the Patient Receives Hospice Services.临终关怀转诊时机:在患者接受临终关怀服务期间评估满意度。
Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2009 Feb 1;21(2):109-116. doi: 10.1177/1084822308323440.
8
[Pain and conflicts: a comparative approach and implications for end-of-life quality of care].[疼痛与冲突:一种比较方法及其对临终护理质量的影响]
Pain Res Manag. 2009 Jul-Aug;14(4):287-92. doi: 10.1155/2009/371953.