Suppr超能文献

不同环境下临终关怀的质量差异:来自美国 Medicare 受益人的国家健康老龄化趋势研究的结果。

Differences of Quality in End-of-Life Care across Settings: Results from the U.S. National Health and Aging Trends Study of Medicare Beneficiaries.

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.

Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;23(9):1198-1203. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0297. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

Abstract

More than 2.5 million older Americans die each year. Place of residence in which dying patients receive care plays a crucial role in the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care. This study aimed to compare proxies' overall rating and ratings for 13 indicators across five major domains of EOL care by place of residence in the last month of decedents' lives. We used data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, a nationally representative study of Medicare beneficiaries at age 65 years and older in the United States. Analyses included proxies ( = 1336) of Medicare beneficiaries who passed away between 2013 and 2016. Proxies were categorized into four groups, depending on place of residence in the last month of life and the involvement of hospice. Quality of EOL care was assessed using questions modeled after quality of EOL care instruments. We adjusted for demographic data of decedents and proxies. Hospice recipients, regardless of setting, were more likely to experience pain and talk about religion in the last month of life; families of patients without hospice in residential care settings were more likely to report not being kept informed; proxies of patients living in private residences with hospice care reported higher overall ratings. Among hospice recipients, those living in private residences were more likely to be treated with respect. Disparities exist across settings and in overall ratings for quality of EOL domains-particularly, the subdomains of symptom management, decision making, and spiritual needs.

摘要

每年有超过 250 万的美国老年人去世。临终患者接受护理的居住地点在临终关怀质量方面起着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在比较在患者生命的最后一个月中,不同居住地点的护理代理人对五个主要临终关怀领域的 13 项指标的整体评分和评分。我们使用了来自美国全国健康老龄化趋势研究的数据,这是一项针对 65 岁及以上医疗保险受益人的全国代表性研究。分析包括在 2013 年至 2016 年间去世的医疗保险受益人的护理代理人(n=1336)。代理人根据生命最后一个月的居住地点和临终关怀的参与情况分为四组。临终关怀质量使用基于临终关怀质量工具的问题进行评估。我们根据死者和代理人的人口统计学数据进行了调整。无论设置如何,接受临终关怀的患者更有可能在生命的最后一个月经历疼痛并谈论宗教;没有接受临终关怀的患者在居住护理环境中的家属更有可能报告没有得到通知;在私人住宅中接受临终关怀的患者的代理人报告了更高的整体评分。在接受临终关怀的患者中,那些居住在私人住宅中的患者更有可能受到尊重。不同的环境存在差异,在临终关怀领域的整体评分方面存在差异-特别是在症状管理、决策和精神需求等子领域。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
The Quality of Dying and Death in a Residential Hospice.《临终关怀机构中的临终与死亡质量》。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Oct;56(4):567-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
10
Is Care for the Dying Improving in the United States?美国对临终者的护理正在改善吗?
J Palliat Med. 2015 Aug;18(8):662-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0039. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验