Suppr超能文献

静脉用药错误的原因:一项人种志研究。

Causes of intravenous medication errors: an ethnographic study.

作者信息

Taxis K, Barber N

机构信息

Department of Practice and Policy, The School of Pharmacy, University of London, London WC1N 1AX, UK.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Oct;12(5):343-7. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.5.343.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intravenous (IV) medication errors are frequent events. They are associated with considerable harm, but little is known about their causes. Human error theory is increasingly used to understand adverse events in medicine, but has not yet been applied to study IV errors. Our aim was to investigate causes of errors in IV drug preparation and administration using a framework of human error theory.

METHODS

A trained and experienced observer accompanied nurses during IV drug rounds on 10 wards in two hospitals (one university teaching hospital and one non-teaching hospital) in the UK. Information came from observation and talking informally to staff. Human error theory was used to analyse the causes of IV error.

RESULTS

265 IV drug errors were identified during observation of 483 drug preparations and 447 administrations. The most common type of error was the deliberate violation of guidelines when injecting bolus doses faster than the recommended speed of 3-5 minutes. Causes included a lack of perceived risk, poor role models, and available technology. Mistakes occurred when drug preparation or administration involved uncommon procedures such as the preparation of very small volumes or the use of unusual drug vial presentations. Causes included a lack of knowledge of preparation or administration procedures and complex design of equipment. Underlying problems were the cultural context allowing unsafe drug use, the failure to teach practical aspects of drug handling, and design failures.

CONCLUSIONS

Training needs and design issues should be addressed to reduce the rate of IV drug preparation and administration errors. This needs a coordinated approach from practitioners, regulators, and the pharmaceutical industry.

摘要

背景

静脉用药错误屡见不鲜。这些错误会造成相当大的危害,但人们对其成因却知之甚少。人因失误理论越来越多地被用于理解医学中的不良事件,但尚未应用于研究静脉用药错误。我们的目的是使用人因失误理论框架调查静脉用药配制和给药错误的原因。

方法

在英国两家医院(一家大学教学医院和一家非教学医院)的10个病房进行静脉用药查房期间,一名训练有素且经验丰富的观察员陪同护士。信息来自观察以及与工作人员的非正式交谈。人因失误理论被用于分析静脉用药错误的原因。

结果

在观察483次药物配制和447次给药过程中,共发现265起静脉用药错误。最常见的错误类型是在推注药物时故意违反指南,推注速度快于推荐的3至5分钟速度。原因包括风险意识不足、榜样不佳以及现有技术问题。当药物配制或给药涉及不常见的操作时会出现失误,例如配制极少量药物或使用不寻常的药瓶包装。原因包括对配制或给药程序缺乏了解以及设备设计复杂。潜在问题包括允许不安全用药的文化背景、未教授药物处理的实际操作以及设计缺陷。

结论

应解决培训需求和设计问题,以降低静脉用药配制和给药错误的发生率。这需要从业者、监管机构和制药行业采取协调一致的方法。

相似文献

1
Causes of intravenous medication errors: an ethnographic study.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Oct;12(5):343-7. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.5.343.
4
Decision-making processes used by nurses during intravenous drug preparation and administration.
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jun;68(6):1302-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05838.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
5
An observational study of intravenous medication errors in the United Kingdom and in Germany.
Pharm World Sci. 2003 Jun;25(3):104-11. doi: 10.1023/a:1024009000113.
6
Ethnographic study of incidence and severity of intravenous drug errors.
BMJ. 2003 Mar 29;326(7391):684. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7391.684.
8
Factors predictive of intravenous fluid administration errors in Australian surgical care wards.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Jun;14(3):179-84. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010728.
9
Medication Errors in Vietnamese Hospitals: Prevalence, Potential Outcome and Associated Factors.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0138284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138284. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

3
Appropriateness of intravenous fluid prescriptions in hospitalised patients: a point prevalence study.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Feb;47(1):136-145. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01816-9. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
9
Improving procedural skills acquisition of students during medical device training: experiments on e-Learning vs. e-Learning with hands-on.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Mar;28(1):127-146. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10148-0. Epub 2022 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
An observational study of intravenous medication errors in the United Kingdom and in Germany.
Pharm World Sci. 2003 Jun;25(3):104-11. doi: 10.1023/a:1024009000113.
2
Ethnographic study of incidence and severity of intravenous drug errors.
BMJ. 2003 Mar 29;326(7391):684. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7391.684.
3
Series of errors.
Lancet. 2002 Oct 26;360(9342):1322. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11313-4.
4
Causes of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a prospective study.
Lancet. 2002 Apr 20;359(9315):1373-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08350-2.
6
Validity and reliability of observational methods for studying medication administration errors.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2001 Jan 1;58(1):54-9. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/58.1.54.
7
Ethnography and health care.
BMJ. 2000 Dec 2;321(7273):1400-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1400.
8
10
Hospital drug distribution systems in the UK and Germany--a study of medication errors.
Pharm World Sci. 1999 Feb;21(1):25-31. doi: 10.1023/a:1008616622472.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验