• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过反应转换评估不同国家着装残疾的可比性。

Assessing comparability of dressing disability in different countries by response conversion.

作者信息

van Buuren S, Eyres S, Tennant A, Hopman-Rock M

机构信息

TNO Prevention and Health, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):15-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.15.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.15
PMID:14533743
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comparability of health data is a major challenge within the context of the Health Monitoring Programme of the European Commission. A common problem in surveys is that many variations of essentially the same question exist.

METHODS

Response conversion is a new method for improving comparability by scaling the data onto a common scale. Comparisons between member states can then be made in terms of the common scale. A first step is the construction of a conversion key. This is a relatively complex activity, but needs to be done only once. The second step is the actual data transformation. This is simple, and can be repeatedly done on a routine basis as new information arrives. Construction of the key is only possible if enough overlapping information can be found.

RESULTS

The method is illustrated for dressing disability from five European countries. Differences occur between countries, between sexes and between age groups. These were similar in magnitude.

CONCLUSION

Response conversion is a new method for enhancing comparability among existing data. Conversion can only be done if a key is available. More work is needed to establish the technique. Future implications within the Health Monitoring Programme are discussed.

摘要

背景

在欧盟委员会健康监测计划的背景下,健康数据的可比性是一项重大挑战。调查中的一个常见问题是,本质上相同的问题存在许多变体。

方法

响应转换是一种通过将数据缩放到共同尺度来提高可比性的新方法。然后可以根据共同尺度对成员国之间进行比较。第一步是构建转换键。这是一项相对复杂的活动,但只需要进行一次。第二步是实际的数据转换。这很简单,并且随着新信息的到来可以定期重复进行。只有在能够找到足够的重叠信息时,才能构建转换键。

结果

以五个欧洲国家的着装残疾情况为例说明了该方法。国家之间、性别之间和年龄组之间存在差异。这些差异在程度上相似。

结论

响应转换是一种增强现有数据可比性的新方法。只有在有转换键的情况下才能进行转换。需要开展更多工作来确立该技术。讨论了其在健康监测计划中的未来影响。

相似文献

1
Assessing comparability of dressing disability in different countries by response conversion.通过反应转换评估不同国家着装残疾的可比性。
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):15-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.15.
2
Creating a coherent set of indicators to monitor health across Europe: the Euro-REVES 2 project.创建一套连贯的指标以监测全欧洲的健康状况:欧洲健康与福祉研究项目2(Euro-REVES 2)
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):6-14. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.6.
3
Coronary and cerebrovascular population-based registers in Europe: are morbidity indicators comparable? Results from the EUROCISS Project.欧洲基于人群的冠状动脉和脑血管疾病登记:发病率指标具有可比性吗?EUROCISS项目的结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):55-60.
4
EURO-MED-STAT: monitoring expenditure and utilization of medicinal products in the European Union countries: a public health approach.欧洲医学统计:监测欧盟国家药品支出和使用情况:一种公共卫生方法
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):95-100. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.95.
5
Evaluation of Health Interview Surveys and Health Examination Surveys in the European Union.欧盟健康访谈调查与健康检查调查评估
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):67-72. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.67.
6
European Union diabetes indicators: fact or fiction?欧盟糖尿病指标:事实还是虚构?
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):51-4. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.51.
7
The comprehensive cancer monitoring programme in Europe.欧洲的综合癌症监测计划。
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):61-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.61.
8
Health indicators in the European Regions.欧洲各地区的健康指标。
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):118-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.118.
9
The Hospital Data Project: comparing hospital activity within Europe.医院数据项目:比较欧洲范围内的医院活动情况。
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):73-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.73.
10
PERISTAT: indicators for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe.围产期健康监测与评估指标:欧洲围产期健康监测与评估指标(PERISTAT)
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):29-37. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.29.

引用本文的文献

1
Data Harmonization in Aging Research: Not so Fast.衰老研究中的数据协调:没那么快。
Exp Aging Res. 2015;41(5):475-95. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2015.1085748.
2
Statistical approaches to harmonize data on cognitive measures in systematic reviews are rarely reported.在系统评价中,用于协调认知测量数据的统计方法鲜有报道。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;68(2):154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
3
Cohort profile: The Dynamic Analyses to Optimize Ageing (DYNOPTA) project.队列简介:优化衰老的动态分析(DYNOPTA)项目
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;39(1):44-51. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn276. Epub 2009 Jan 17.
4
Cross-diagnostic validity in a generic instrument: an example from the Functional Independence Measure in Scandinavia.通用工具中的交叉诊断效度:来自斯堪的纳维亚地区功能独立性测量的一个例子。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Aug 23;4:55. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-55.