• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围产期健康监测与评估指标:欧洲围产期健康监测与评估指标(PERISTAT)

PERISTAT: indicators for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe.

作者信息

Zeitlin Jennifer, Wildman Katherine, Bréart Gérard, Alexander Sophie, Barros Henrique, Blondel Béatrice, Buitendijk Simone, Gissler Mika, Macfarlane Alison

机构信息

Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women's Health, U149 INSERM, Paris, France.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):29-37. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.29.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.29
PMID:14533746
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The PERISTAT project aimed to develop an indicator set for monitoring and describing perinatal health in Europe. The challenge was to define indicators that cover common concerns and have the same meaning within the different European health care systems.

METHODS

PERISTAT included i) a review of existing recommendations on perinatal health indicators, ii) a DELPHI consensus process with a scientific advisory committee composed of a clinician and an epidemiologist or statistician from each European member state as well as with a panel of midwives, and iii) a study of the availability of national statistics to construct recommended indicators. This article describes the first two components.

RESULTS

The review identified 10 international and 13 national recommended indicator sets. It also included indicators routinely compiled by WHO, EUROSTAT and OECD. Because of the methodological limits to using existing indicators for European comparisons, a high priority was placed on improving indicators already collected. Using the DELPHI method based on the results of the review, the scientific committee achieved a consensus on ten core and 23 recommended indicators, including 12 requiring further development.

CONCLUSIONS

The PERISTAT project was successful in identifying a set of indicators, which drew on and consolidated previous work. Consensus was not achieved on precise indicators in areas where uncertainty about appropriate indicators was high, although areas were targeted for future development. Finally, the feasibility study, which is in progress, is an essential part of the project, since it will enable member states to evaluate their capacity to produce these indicators.

摘要

背景

围产期健康指标统计(PERISTAT)项目旨在制定一套用于监测和描述欧洲围产期健康状况的指标体系。面临的挑战是定义出能涵盖共同关注问题且在不同欧洲医疗体系中具有相同含义的指标。

方法

围产期健康指标统计项目包括:i)对围产期健康指标现有建议的审查;ii)与由来自每个欧洲成员国的一名临床医生和一名流行病学家或统计学家组成的科学咨询委员会以及一组助产士进行的德尔菲共识达成过程;iii)对构建推荐指标所需国家统计数据可用性的研究。本文描述了前两个部分。

结果

审查确定了10套国际推荐指标和13套国家推荐指标。还包括世界卫生组织、欧盟统计局和经济合作与发展组织常规汇编的指标。由于使用现有指标进行欧洲范围内比较存在方法上的局限性,因此高度重视改进已收集的指标。基于审查结果采用德尔菲法,科学委员会就10项核心指标和23项推荐指标达成了共识,其中包括需进一步完善的12项指标。

结论

围产期健康指标统计项目成功确定了一套借鉴并整合了以往工作的指标体系。在合适指标不确定性较高的领域,未就精确指标达成共识,不过已确定了未来的发展方向。最后,正在进行的可行性研究是该项目的重要组成部分,因为它将使成员国能够评估自身生成这些指标的能力。

相似文献

1
PERISTAT: indicators for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe.围产期健康监测与评估指标:欧洲围产期健康监测与评估指标(PERISTAT)
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):29-37. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.29.
2
Selecting an indicator set for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe: criteria, methods and results from the PERISTAT project.选择用于监测和评估欧洲围产期健康的指标集:PERISTAT项目的标准、方法与结果
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Nov 28;111 Suppl 1:S5-S14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.002.
3
Report of the EGOHID I Project. Selecting a coherent set of indicators for monitoring and evaluating oral health in Europe: criteria, methods and results from the EGOHID I project.EGOHID I项目报告。为欧洲口腔健康监测与评估选择一套连贯的指标:EGOHID I项目的标准、方法与结果。
Community Dent Health. 2008 Mar;25(1):4-10.
4
The European perinatal health report: delivering comparable data for examining differences in maternal and infant health.欧洲围产保健报告:提供可比数据以检查母婴健康差异
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Oct;146(2):149-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.07.017. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
5
Migration and perinatal health surveillance: an international Delphi survey.迁移和围产健康监测:一项国际德尔菲调查。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Mar;149(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
6
Indicators of fetal and infant health outcomes.胎儿和婴儿健康结局指标。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Nov 28;111 Suppl 1:S66-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.007.
7
The ECHI project: health indicators for the European Community.欧洲健康信息指标(ECHI)项目:欧盟的健康指标
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):101-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.101.
8
Maternal and Perinatal Health in Umbria region in 2012.2012年翁布里亚地区的孕产妇和围产期健康状况
Ann Ig. 2015 May-Jun;27(3):580-9. doi: 10.7416/ai.2015.2049.
9
[Health status of mothers and children in Poland compared to other European Union countries on the basis of EURO-PERISTAT indicators].基于欧洲统计局指标比较波兰与其他欧盟国家的母婴健康状况
Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2010 Apr-Jun;14(2):113-28.
10
European indicators of health care during pregnancy, delivery and the postpartum period.欧洲孕期、分娩期及产后期的医疗保健指标。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Nov 28;111 Suppl 1:S53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Perinatal outcomes in Malta between 2008 and 2022: a comparison of three 5 yearly epochs.2008年至2022年马耳他的围产期结局:三个五年期的比较。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;13:1514661. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1514661. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating Perinatal Health in Europe: A Comparison of Routine Population Birth Data Sources.评估欧洲围产期健康状况:常规人口出生数据来源的比较
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2025 Jul;39(5):405-416. doi: 10.1111/ppe.13178. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
3
Severe adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the planned birth setting being midwife-led birth centers or obstetric-led units.
根据计划分娩地点是由助产士主导的分娩中心还是产科主导的单位,产妇和新生儿的严重不良结局情况。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Dec;103(12):2465-2474. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14971. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
4
Socioeconomic disparities in changes to preterm birth and stillbirth rates during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: a study of 21 European countries.COVID-19 大流行第一年期间,21 个欧洲国家的早产率和死胎率变化的社会经济差异:一项研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;34(Supplement_1):i58-i66. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad186.
5
Developing and testing a protocol using a common data model for federated collection and analysis of national perinatal health indicators in Europe.开发并测试一种使用通用数据模型进行欧洲国家围产期健康指标联合收集与分析的方案。
Open Res Eur. 2023 Sep 4;3:54. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15701.2. eCollection 2023.
6
Nationwide-free preconception care strategy: Experience from China.全国免费孕前保健策略:中国的经验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;10:934983. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.934983. eCollection 2022.
7
Association Between Income and Perinatal Mortality in the Netherlands Across Gestational Age.荷兰不同胎龄的收入与围产儿死亡率的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2132124. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32124.
8
Developing a tool to monitor knowledge translation in the health system: results from an international Delphi study.开发一种监测卫生系统知识转化的工具:来自国际德尔菲研究的结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;31(4):695-702. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab117.
9
Reducing Sexual and Reproductive Health Inequities Between Natives and Migrants: A Delphi Consensus for Sustainable Cross-Cultural Healthcare Pathways.减少原住民和移民之间在性健康和生殖健康方面的不平等:可持续跨文化医疗保健途径的德尔菲共识。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 13;9:656454. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.656454. eCollection 2021.
10
Selecting contextually appropriate performance indicators in a circumpolar context: a modified Delphi approach.在环极背景下选择语境适宜的绩效指标:一种改良德尔菲法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 30;21(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06485-2.