Suppr超能文献

是否有证据表明力量可以不对称地转移到未训练的肢体上?

Is there evidence for the asymmetrical transfer of strength to an untrained limb?

机构信息

Department of Sport and Health, Solent University, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14 0YN, UK.

Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, P.O. Box 1848, University, MS, 38677, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Aug;124(8):2503-2510. doi: 10.1007/s00421-024-05472-9. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The literature predominantly addresses cross-education of strength in the dominant limb rather than the non-dominant limb, guided by the hypothesis of an asymmetrical transfer of strength from unilateral training protocols. The purpose of the study was to review the literature and determine how much evidence was available to support this claim. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the magnitude of this hypothesized asymmetrical transfer of strength.

METHODS

A literature search of all possible records was implemented using Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Scopus from February 2022 to May 2022. Comparison of randomized controlled trials was computed. The change scores and standard deviations of those change scores were extracted for each group. Only three studies met the criteria, from which a total of five effect sizes were extracted and further analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall effect of resistance training of the dominant limb on strength transfer to the non-dominant limb relative to the effects of resistance training the non-dominant limb on strength transfer to the dominant (non-training) limb was 0.46 (SE 0.42). The analysis from this study resulted in minimal support for the asymmetry hypothesis. Given the small number of studies available, we provide the effect but note that the estimate is unlikely to be stable.

CONCLUSION

Although it is repeatedly stated that there is an asymmetrical transfer of strength, our results find little support for that claim. This is not to say that it does not exist, but additional research implementing a control group and a direct comparison between limbs is needed to better understand this question.

摘要

目的

文献主要探讨了优势肢体的力量交叉训练,而不是非优势肢体的力量交叉训练,这一观点是基于单侧训练方案的力量不对称转移假说。本研究的目的是综述文献,确定有多少证据支持这一假说。采用荟萃分析来估计这种假设的力量不对称转移的幅度。

方法

2022 年 2 月至 2022 年 5 月,使用 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed 和 Scopus 对所有可能的记录进行文献检索。比较了随机对照试验。提取了每个组的变化分数和这些变化分数的标准差。只有三项研究符合标准,从中提取了总共五个效应量进行进一步分析。

结果

与非优势肢体的力量训练对优势(非训练)肢体的力量转移相比,优势肢体的力量训练对非优势肢体的力量转移的总体效果为 0.46(SE 0.42)。本研究的分析结果对不对称假说的支持作用很小。考虑到可用研究数量较少,我们提供了该效应,但请注意,该估计值可能不稳定。

结论

尽管反复指出存在力量的不对称转移,但我们的结果几乎没有支持这一说法。这并不是说它不存在,但需要更多的研究来实施对照组,并直接比较肢体,以更好地理解这个问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/11322193/8ba27daba139/421_2024_5472_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验