• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处理听觉和视觉言语时的抽象与特定模态记忆表征

Abstract versus modality-specific memory representations in processing auditory and visual speech.

作者信息

de Gelder B, Vroomen J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1992 Sep;20(5):533-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03199585.

DOI:10.3758/bf03199585
PMID:1453970
Abstract

Serial recall of lip-read, auditory, and audiovisual memory lists with and without a verbal suffix was examined. Recency effects were the same in the three presentation modalities. The disrupting effect of a suffix was largest when it was presented in the same modality as the list items. The results suggest that abstract linguistic as well as modality-specific codes play a role in memory for auditory and visual speech.

摘要

研究了在有和没有语言后缀的情况下,对唇读、听觉和视听记忆列表的系列回忆。近期效应在三种呈现方式中是相同的。当后缀与列表项目以相同方式呈现时,其干扰效应最大。结果表明,抽象语言代码以及特定模态代码在听觉和视觉言语记忆中都起作用。

相似文献

1
Abstract versus modality-specific memory representations in processing auditory and visual speech.处理听觉和视觉言语时的抽象与特定模态记忆表征
Mem Cognit. 1992 Sep;20(5):533-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03199585.
2
Recency and suffix effects in serial recall of musical stimuli.音乐刺激序列回忆中的近因效应和后缀效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Oct;12(4):517-24. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.12.4.517.
3
Modalities of memory: is reading lips like hearing voices?记忆的方式:读唇是否类似于听声音?
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):471-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.017. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
4
The modality effect and echoic persistence.模态效应与回声记忆
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Sep;109(3):251-78. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.3.251.
5
Immediate serial recall of mixed-modality lists.混合模态列表的即时系列回忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Mar;15(2):266-74. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.2.266.
6
Serial recall of two-voice lists: implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects.双声列表的序列回忆:对听觉近因理论和后缀效应的启示
Mem Cognit. 1991 Jan;19(1):72-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03198497.
7
Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.是否存在模态效应?视觉近因效应和后缀效应的证据。
Mem Cognit. 1990 Nov;18(6):651-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03197107.
8
Children's suffix effects for verbal working memory reflect phonological coding and perceptual grouping.儿童言语工作记忆的后缀效应反映了语音编码和知觉分组。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Jul;183:276-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
9
Memory as embodiment: The case of modality and serial short-term memory.作为具身认知的记忆:模态与系列短时记忆的案例
Cognition. 2016 Oct;155:113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
10
Echoic and retrieval accounts of the long-term modality effect tested using the suffix procedure.使用后缀程序测试的长期模态效应的回声和检索解释。
Am J Psychol. 1986 Winter;99(4):453-70.

引用本文的文献

1
How Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implantation Affect Verbal Working Memory: Evidence From Adolescents.听力损失和人工耳蜗植入如何影响言语工作记忆:来自青少年的证据。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Jun 6;67(6):1850-1867. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00446. Epub 2024 May 7.
2
Beyond Recognition: Visual Contributions to Verbal Working Memory.难以辨认:视觉对言语工作记忆的贡献。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Jan 12;65(1):253-273. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00177. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
How the bimodal format of presentation affects working memory: an overview.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of attention in visual and auditory suffix effects.注意在视觉和听觉后缀效应中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 1975 Sep;3(5):501-5. doi: 10.3758/BF03197521.
2
Hearing by eye.通过眼睛听觉。 (此表述不太符合常规逻辑,可能原文有误,但按要求翻译如此。)
Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):85-99. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248235.
3
Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language.美国手语先天性聋人使用者中的非听觉后缀效应。
呈现的双峰模式如何影响工作记忆:综述
Cogn Process. 2008 Mar;9(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0195-6. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
4
Two-component theory of the suffix effect: contrary evidence.后缀效应的双成分理论:相反的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Apr;34(3):648-67. doi: 10.3758/bf03193586.
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1981 Nov;7(6):464-74.
4
The acoustic correlates of "speechlike": a use of the suffix effect.“类语音”的声学关联:后缀效应的一种应用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1981 Dec;110(4):568-93. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.110.4.568.
5
The modality effect and echoic persistence.模态效应与回声记忆
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Sep;109(3):251-78. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.3.251.
6
Further evidence of interference between lipreading and auditory recency.唇读与听觉新近效应之间干扰的进一步证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1983 Apr;9(2):328-33. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.9.2.328.
7
On recency and echoic memory.关于近因记忆和回声记忆。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1983 Aug 11;302(1110):267-82. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1983.0054.
8
The purity of auditory memory.听觉记忆的纯度。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1983 Aug 11;302(1110):251-65. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1983.0053.
9
Testing visual short-term memory: simultaneous versus sequential presentations.测试视觉短期记忆:同时呈现与顺序呈现
Mem Cognit. 1985 Jul;13(4):346-56. doi: 10.3758/bf03202502.
10
Face recognition and lipreading. A neurological dissociation.
Brain. 1986 Jun;109 ( Pt 3):509-21. doi: 10.1093/brain/109.3.509.