Siuniakova E V, Borisova A M, Martynov A I, Pinegin B V, Podobin N P, Tverskoĭ K A
Ter Arkh. 1992;64(5):51-3.
Unlike hemocarboperfusion (HCP), plasmapheresis (PA) produces a long-term effect in the treatment of serious cases of rheumatoid arthritis. This explains why the rebound syndrome occurs in PA two times less frequently. The analysis of the immunomodifying action of both the treatments and comparison of their efficacy suggest the conclusion that long-term and complete remissions are associated with the immunosuppressive effects, while the development of exacerbations accompanies the immunomodifying effect. HCP stimulates the immune system, while PA can induce both stimulation and suppression. Therefore, HCP can be used as an adjuvant treatment of highly active rheumatoid arthritis before the basic therapy. In PA immunosuppressive effect, it may be used as an original treatment method.
与血液灌流(HCP)不同,血浆置换(PA)在重症类风湿关节炎的治疗中产生长期效果。这就解释了为什么PA中反弹综合征的发生率要低两倍。对两种治疗方法的免疫调节作用进行分析并比较其疗效后得出结论:长期和完全缓解与免疫抑制作用有关,而病情加重则伴随着免疫调节作用。HCP刺激免疫系统,而PA既能诱导刺激又能诱导抑制。因此,HCP可在基础治疗前用作高活性类风湿关节炎的辅助治疗。在PA具有免疫抑制作用的情况下,它可作为一种原始治疗方法。