Betz Randal R, Kim John, D'Andrea Linda P, Mulcahey M J, Balsara Rohinton K, Clements David H
Shriners Hospitals for Children, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):S255-65. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092484.31316.32.
Retrospective review.
To report the feasibility, safety, and utility of vertebral body stapling without fusion as an alternative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
The success rate of brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis ranges from 50% to 82%. However, poor self-image and brace compliance are issues for the patient. An alternative method of treatment such as a motion-preserving vertebral body stapling to provide curve stability would be desirable.
We retrospectively reviewed 21 patients (27 curves) with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with vertebral body stapling. Patients were immature as defined by Risser sign <or=2.
The concept of vertebral body stapling of the convex side of a patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is feasible. The procedure was safe, with no major complications and three minor complications. One patient had an intraoperative segmental vein bleed resulting in an increased estimated blood loss of 1500 cc as compared to the average estimated blood loss of 247 cc for all patients. One patient had a chylothorax and one pancreatitis. No patient has had a staple dislodge or move during the follow-up period (mean 11 months, range 3-36 months), and no adverse effects specifically from the staples have been identified. Utility (defined as curve stability) was evaluated in 10 patients with stapling with greater than 1-year follow-up (mean 22.6 months) and preoperative curve <50 degrees. Progression of >or=6 degrees or beyond 50 degrees was considered a failure of treatment. Of these 10 patients, 6 (60%) remained stable or improved and 4 (40%) progressed. One of 10 (10%) in the stapling group had progressed beyond 50 degrees and went on to fusion. Six patients required stapling of a second curve, three as part of the primary surgery, and three as a second stage, because a second untreated curve progressed. The results need to be considered with caution, as the follow-up is still short.
The data demonstrate that vertebral body stapling for the treatment of scoliosis in the adolescent was feasible and safe in this group of 21 patients. In the short-term, stapling appears to have utility in stabilizing curves of progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
回顾性研究。
报告椎体钉合术不融合作为青少年特发性脊柱侧凸替代治疗方法的可行性、安全性和效用。
青少年特发性脊柱侧凸支具治疗的成功率在50%至82%之间。然而,患者存在自我形象不佳和支具依从性差的问题。一种替代治疗方法,如保留运动功能的椎体钉合术以提供曲线稳定性,将是理想的。
我们回顾性分析了21例(27个曲线)接受椎体钉合术治疗的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者。患者根据Risser征≤2定义为未成熟。
青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者凸侧椎体钉合术的概念是可行的。该手术安全,无重大并发症,有3例轻微并发症。1例患者术中节段静脉出血,估计失血量比所有患者平均估计失血量247 cc增加了1500 cc。1例患者发生乳糜胸,1例发生胰腺炎。随访期间(平均11个月,范围3 - 36个月)无患者出现钉松动或移位,未发现钉的特异性不良反应。对10例随访超过1年(平均22.6个月)且术前曲线<50度的钉合术患者评估了效用(定义为曲线稳定性)。进展≥6度或超过50度被视为治疗失败。在这10例患者中,6例(60%)保持稳定或改善,4例(40%)进展。钉合术组10例中有1例(10%)进展超过50度并继续进行融合手术。6例患者需要对第二条曲线进行钉合,3例作为初次手术的一部分,3例作为二期手术,因为未治疗的第二条曲线进展。由于随访时间仍较短,结果需谨慎考虑。
数据表明,在这组21例患者中,椎体钉合术治疗青少年脊柱侧凸是可行且安全的。短期内,钉合术似乎对稳定进展性青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的曲线有效用。