Suppr超能文献

政治选举中的事后诸葛亮式偏差。

Hindsight bias in political elections.

作者信息

Blank Hartmut, Fischer Volkhard, Erdfelder Edgar

机构信息

Institut für Allgemeine Psychologie, University of Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Memory. 2003 Jul-Sep;11(4-5):491-504. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000513.

Abstract

Two studies on political hindsight bias were conducted on the occasions of the German parliament election in 1998 and the Nordrhein-Westfalen state parliament election in 2000. In both studies, participants predicted the percentage of votes for several political parties and recalled these predictions after the election. The observed hindsight effects were stronger than those found in any prior study on political elections (using percentage of votes as the dependent variable). We argue that the length of the retention interval between original judgement and recollection is mainly responsible for this difference. In our second study, we investigated possible artifacts in political hindsight biases using a control-group design where half of the participants recalled their predictions shortly before or after the election. Hindsight bias was preserved, reinforcing the results of earlier studies with non-control-group designs. Finally, we discuss the possibility that the hindsight experience (in political judgement and in general) actually consists of three different, partly independent components.

摘要

关于政治后见之明偏差的两项研究分别在1998年德国议会选举和2000年北莱茵 - 威斯特法伦州议会选举期间进行。在这两项研究中,参与者预测了几个政党的得票百分比,并在选举后回忆这些预测。观察到的后见之明效应比以往任何关于政治选举的研究(以得票百分比作为因变量)都要强。我们认为,原始判断与回忆之间的保留间隔时长主要是造成这种差异的原因。在我们的第二项研究中,我们采用对照组设计调查了政治后见之明偏差中可能存在的人为因素,在该设计中,一半参与者在选举前不久或之后回忆他们的预测。后见之明偏差依然存在,这强化了早期非对照组设计研究的结果。最后,我们讨论了后见之明体验(在政治判断及一般情况下)实际上由三个不同的、部分独立的成分组成的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验