• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于模拟的教育中的复杂性:探索后见之明偏差的作用。

Complexity in simulation-based education: exploring the role of hindsight bias.

作者信息

Motavalli Al, Nestel Debra

机构信息

1Department of Anaesthesia, The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, VIC 3002 Australia.

2HealthPEER, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC Australia.

出版信息

Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 Jan 11;1:3. doi: 10.1186/s41077-015-0005-7. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1186/s41077-015-0005-7
PMID:29449972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5796605/
Abstract

Simulation-based education (SBE) has the potential to misrepresent clinical practice as relatively simplistic, and as being made safer through simplistic behavioural explanations. This review provides an overview of a well-documented and robust psychological construct - in the context of learning in healthcare simulations. Motivating this review are our observations that post-simulation debriefings may be oversimplified and by knowledge of scenario outcomes. Sometimes only limited consideration is given to issues that might be relevant to management in the complexity and uncertainty of real clinical practice. We use literature on to define the concept, inputs and implications. We offer examples from SBE where hindsight bias may occur and propose suggestions for mitigation. Influences of hindsight biases on SBE should be addressed by future studies.

摘要

基于模拟的教育(SBE)有可能将临床实践错误地呈现为相对简单化,并通过简单化的行为解释使其更安全。本综述概述了一个有充分文献记载且可靠的心理结构——在医疗模拟学习的背景下。促使我们进行本综述的是我们的观察结果,即模拟后的总结汇报可能过于简单化,并且受到情景结果知识的影响。有时,对于在真实临床实践的复杂性和不确定性中可能与管理相关的问题,只给予了有限的考虑。我们利用关于[具体内容缺失]的文献来定义概念、输入因素和影响。我们提供了SBE中可能出现事后诸葛亮偏见的例子,并提出了缓解建议。未来的研究应解决事后诸葛亮偏见对SBE的影响。

相似文献

1
Complexity in simulation-based education: exploring the role of hindsight bias.基于模拟的教育中的复杂性:探索后见之明偏差的作用。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 Jan 11;1:3. doi: 10.1186/s41077-015-0005-7. eCollection 2016.
2
Hindsight bias: how knowledge and heuristics affect our reconstruction of the past.事后诸葛亮式偏差:知识和启发式思维如何影响我们对过去的重构。
Memory. 2003 Jul-Sep;11(4-5):357-77. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000595.
3
Pragmatic, constructive, and reconstructive memory influences on the hindsight bias.后见之明偏差的实用主义、建设性和重构性记忆影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):331-340. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02158-1. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
4
Biases in the production and reception of collective knowledge: the case of hindsight bias in Wikipedia.集体知识产生与接受中的偏差:以维基百科中的后见之明偏差为例。
Psychol Res. 2018 Sep;82(5):1010-1026. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0865-7. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
5
Hindsight Bias.后见之明偏差。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep;7(5):411-26. doi: 10.1177/1745691612454303.
6
[Pain patients show a higher hindsight bias].疼痛患者表现出更高的后见之明偏差。
Z Exp Psychol. 1997;44(4):561-88.
7
The impact of design elements on undergraduate nursing students' educational outcomes in simulation education: protocol for a systematic review.设计元素对模拟教育中本科护理学生教育成果的影响:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 23;11(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01926-3.
8
Wikipedia outperforms individuals when it comes to hindsight bias.当涉及后见之明偏差时,维基百科比个人表现更好。
Psychol Res. 2020 Sep;84(6):1517-1527. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01165-7. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
9
Is there hindsight bias without real hindsight? Conjectures are sufficient to elicit hindsight bias.没有真正的后见之明时会存在后见之明偏差吗?推测就足以引发后见之明偏差。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019 Mar;25(1):88-99. doi: 10.1037/xap0000185. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
10
Knowledge updating in real-world estimation: Connecting hindsight bias and seeding effects.真实世界估计中的知识更新:连接后见之明偏差和播种效应。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Nov;152(11):3167-3188. doi: 10.1037/xge0001452. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
When common cognitive biases impact debriefing conversations.当常见的认知偏差影响汇报谈话时。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Dec 18;9(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00324-0.
2
Development of a low-cost congenital abdominal wall defect simulator (wall-go) for undergraduate medical education: a validation study.开发一种用于本科医学教育的低成本先天性腹壁缺陷模拟器(wall-go):验证研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):966. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04929-3.
3
Teaching Culturally Safe Care in Simulated Cultural Communication Scenarios During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Virtual Visits with Indigenous Animators.在新冠疫情期间的模拟文化交流场景中教授文化安全护理:与原住民动画师进行虚拟访问
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Apr 4;9:23821205221091034. doi: 10.1177/23821205221091034. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Recommendations for Optimizing Virtual Simulation: A Trial and Error Process From the COVID-19 Pandemic.优化虚拟模拟的建议:来自新冠疫情的反复试验过程
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Feb;14(1):18-21. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00515.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Hindsight Bias.后见之明偏差。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep;7(5):411-26. doi: 10.1177/1745691612454303.
2
Explaining Away: A Model of Affective Adaptation.解释消除:情感适应的一种模型。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;3(5):370-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00085.x.
3
Towards socio-material approaches in simulation-based education: lessons from complexity theory.迈向基于模拟的教育中的社会-物质方法:复杂性理论的启示。
Med Educ. 2015 Apr;49(4):359-67. doi: 10.1111/medu.12638.
4
Investigating industrial investigation: examining the impact of a priori knowledge and tunnel vision education.
Law Hum Behav. 2013 Dec;37(6):441-53. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000056.
5
A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education.对模拟演练总结汇报在卫生专业教育中的有效性的系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jun;34(6):e58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.020. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
6
Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82.《医疗保健教育中的模拟:最佳证据实用指南》。AMEE 指南第 82 号。
Med Teach. 2013 Oct;35(10):e1511-30. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
7
Shared visual attention reduces hindsight bias.共同视觉注意减少后见之明偏差。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Dec;23(12):1524-33. doi: 10.1177/0956797612447817. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
8
Evolving judgments of terror risks: foresight, hindsight, and emotion: a reanalysis.不断变化的恐怖风险判断:前瞻性、后见之明和情绪:再分析。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012 Jun;18(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1037/a0027959.
9
Hindsight bias and causal reasoning: a minimalist approach.
Cogn Process. 2012 Feb;13(1):63-72. doi: 10.1007/s10339-011-0414-z. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
10
Hindsight bias from 3 to 95 years of age.回溯偏差:从 3 岁到 95 岁。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):378-91. doi: 10.1037/a0021971.