McInnes Gordon T
University of Glasgow, Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2003 Sep-Oct;5(5):337-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.00511.x.
Large-scale outcome trials have demonstrated that blood pressure reduction with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is associated with reduced cardiovascular complications in hypertension. Comparative trials against conventional drugs and between ACE inhibitors and CCBs have failed to reveal conclusive differences in cause-specific outcomes. Studies in high-risk patients suggest that ACE inhibitors are superior to CCBs and other drugs in protection against cardiovascular events and renal disease. Very long-term prospectively collected observational data from the Glasgow Blood Pressure Clinic and the UK General Practice Research Database strongly support an advantage of ACE inhibitors over CCBs for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Considering all the available information, it can be concluded that the use of CCBs in the routine therapy of hypertension cannot be recommended while wider use of ACE inhibitors, along with low-dose diuretics and beta blockers, appears justified.
大规模疗效试验表明,使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂或钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)降低血压与高血压患者心血管并发症减少相关。与传统药物以及ACE抑制剂和CCB之间的对比试验未能揭示特定病因结局方面的确切差异。对高危患者的研究表明,在预防心血管事件和肾脏疾病方面,ACE抑制剂优于CCB和其他药物。来自格拉斯哥血压诊所和英国全科医学研究数据库的长期前瞻性收集的观察数据有力地支持了ACE抑制剂在心血管发病率和死亡率方面优于CCB的观点。综合所有现有信息,可以得出结论,不建议在高血压常规治疗中使用CCB,而更广泛地使用ACE抑制剂以及低剂量利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂似乎是合理的。