Filbeck T, Pichlmeier U, Knuechel R, Wieland W F, Rössler W
Urologische Abteilung, Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Regensburg.
Urologe A. 2003 Oct;42(10):1366-73. doi: 10.1007/s00120-003-0355-y. Epub 2003 Apr 25.
A prospective monocentre randomized parallel-group Phase III trial was performed to investigate whether primary transurethral resection (TUR) with 5-aminolevulinic acid induced Fluorescence diagnosis (FD) allows for a more thorough TUR of superficial Bladder Carcinoma compared to conventional white light (WL). Evaluation of residual tumor rate and recurrence free survival were defined as the two primary study endpoints. The residual tumor rate was 25.2% in the WL arm (n=103) vs. 4.5% in the (n=88) FD arm (p<0.0001). Median follow up of the patients in the WL arm was 42 months (range 25-61) compared to 43 (range 24-61) in the FD arm. Recurrence free survival in the fluorescence diagnosis group was 90.9%, 90.9% und 85 % after 12, 24 and 48 months compared with 78.6%, 69.9% und 60.7 %, respectively, in the white light group (p=0.0005). This superiority proved to be independent of risk group. The adjusted hazard ratio of fluorescence diagnosis versus white light transurethral resection was 0.29 (95% CI: [0.15; 0.56]). ALA induced FD is statistically significantly superior to conventional WL TUR with respect to both residual tumor rate and recurrence-free survival. The differences in RFS imply that FD offers a clinically relevant procedure to reduce the number of tumor recurrences.
一项前瞻性单中心随机平行组III期试验开展,旨在研究与传统白光(WL)相比,5-氨基乙酰丙酸诱导荧光诊断(FD)下的经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TUR)能否更彻底地切除浅表性膀胱癌。将残余肿瘤率和无复发生存率的评估定义为两个主要研究终点。白光组(n = 103)的残余肿瘤率为25.2%,而荧光诊断组(n = 88)为4.5%(p < 0.0001)。白光组患者的中位随访时间为42个月(范围25 - 61个月),而荧光诊断组为43个月(范围24 - 61个月)。荧光诊断组在12、24和48个月后的无复发生存率分别为90.9%、90.9%和85%,而白光组分别为78.6%、69.9%和60.7%(p = 0.0005)。这种优势被证明与风险组无关。荧光诊断与白光经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的调整后风险比为0.29(95% CI:[0.15; 0.56])。在残余肿瘤率和无复发生存率方面,ALA诱导的荧光诊断在统计学上显著优于传统白光经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术。无复发生存率的差异表明,荧光诊断提供了一种临床上相关的方法来减少肿瘤复发的次数。