Joris Jean L, Jacob Eric A, Sessler Daniel I, Deleuse Jean-François J, Kaba Abdourahamane, Lamy Maurice L
*Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine and †the Outcomes Research® Institute and Department of Anesthesiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1446-1451. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000082251.85534.84.
When used alone, lipid-soluble epidural opioids are thought to produce analgesia supraspinally via systemic absorption. However, spinal opioids and local anesthetics have been shown to act synergistically at the spinal level in animal studies. We, therefore, tested the hypothesis that sufentanil requirements will be less when given epidurally than IV in patients simultaneously given epidural bupivacaine after major abdominal surgery. Forty patients were anesthetized with isoflurane and epidural bupivacaine for major abdominal surgery. After surgery, each was given a continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine at a rate of 5 mg/h and sufentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). In a randomized, double-blinded fashion, the sufentanil was given either epidurally or IV. PCA settings were the same in each group. For 60 hrs after surgery, the following variables were measured: pain scores at rest, during mobilization, and during coughing; extension of sensory block; side effects; and sufentanil consumption. Pain scores, extension of sensory block, and the incidence of side effects did not differ between the two groups. Consumption of sufentanil in the epidural group was half that of the IV group (48 h after surgery: 107 +/- 57 microg versus 207 +/- 100 microg for the epidural and IV groups, respectively; P < 0.05). We conclude that spinal mechanisms contribute to the analgesia produced by epidural sufentanil in combination with a local anesthetic.
When combined with epidural bupivacaine, the sufentanil requirement was 50% less when given epidurally than IV. Epidural sufentanil thus appears to have a spinal mechanism of action.
单独使用时,脂溶性硬膜外阿片类药物被认为是通过全身吸收在脊髓以上产生镇痛作用。然而,在动物研究中,脊髓阿片类药物和局部麻醉药已被证明在脊髓水平具有协同作用。因此,我们检验了这样一个假设:在接受腹部大手术后同时给予硬膜外布比卡因的患者中,硬膜外给予舒芬太尼时所需剂量比静脉注射时少。40例接受腹部大手术的患者用异氟烷和硬膜外布比卡因麻醉。术后,每例患者均以5mg/h的速率持续硬膜外输注布比卡因,并给予舒芬太尼患者自控镇痛(PCA)。采用随机、双盲方式,舒芬太尼通过硬膜外或静脉给药。每组的PCA设置相同。术后60小时,测量以下变量:静息时、活动时和咳嗽时的疼痛评分;感觉阻滞范围;副作用;以及舒芬太尼消耗量。两组之间的疼痛评分、感觉阻滞范围和副作用发生率没有差异。硬膜外组舒芬太尼的消耗量是静脉组的一半(术后48小时:硬膜外组和静脉组分别为107±57μg和207±100μg;P<0.05)。我们得出结论,脊髓机制有助于硬膜外舒芬太尼与局部麻醉药联合产生的镇痛作用。
与硬膜外布比卡因联合使用时,硬膜外给予舒芬太尼的需求量比静脉注射时少50%。因此,硬膜外舒芬太尼似乎具有脊髓作用机制。