Coburn David
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8.
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jan;58(1):41-56. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00159-x.
This paper describes and critiques the income inequality approach to health inequalities. It then presents an alternative class-based model through a focus on the causes and not only the consequences of income inequalities. In this model, the relationship between income inequality and health appears as a special case within a broader causal chain. It is argued that global and national socio-political-economic trends have increased the power of business classes and lowered that of working classes. The neo-liberal policies accompanying these trends led to increased income inequality but also poverty and unequal access to many other health-relevant resources. But international pressures towards neo-liberal doctrines and policies are differentially resisted by various nations because of historically embedded variation in class and institutional structures. Data presented indicates that neo-liberalism is associated with greater poverty and income inequalities, and greater health inequalities within nations. Furthermore, countries with Social Democratic forms of welfare regimes (i.e., those that are less neo-liberal) have better health than do those that are more neo-liberal. The paper concludes with discussion of what further steps are needed to "go beyond" the income inequality hypothesis towards consideration of a broader set of the social determinants of health.
本文描述并批判了用收入不平等来解释健康不平等的方法。接着,本文提出了一种基于阶级的替代模型,该模型不仅关注收入不平等的后果,还关注其成因。在这个模型中,收入不平等与健康之间的关系在一个更广泛的因果链中表现为一个特殊情况。本文认为,全球和国家的社会政治经济趋势增强了商业阶层的力量,削弱了工人阶级的力量。伴随这些趋势的新自由主义政策导致了收入不平等加剧,同时也造成了贫困以及在获取许多其他与健康相关资源方面的不平等。但是,由于阶级和制度结构在历史上形成的差异,各国对新自由主义学说和政策的国际压力的抵制程度各不相同。所呈现的数据表明,新自由主义与更大程度的贫困、收入不平等以及国家内部更大程度的健康不平等相关联。此外,具有社会民主福利制度形式(即那些新自由主义程度较低的制度)的国家,其民众健康状况要优于那些新自由主义程度更高的国家。本文最后讨论了需要采取哪些进一步措施,以“超越”收入不平等假设,进而考虑更广泛的健康社会决定因素。