Kekkaku. 2003 Sep;78(9):601-4.
New quinolones (NQs) have acquired potent antimicrobial activity against gram-positive cocci and penetrate well into organs when compared with old quinolones. Their indications were extended to the treatment of respiratory infection caused by gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, and their possibility of an indication for the treatment of mycobacteriosis has been considered. Mycobacteriosis, against which NQs are expected to be effective, includes tuberculosis, which involves a problem of multiple-drug resistant bacteria, and atypical mycobacteriosis, for which there are few remedies. Since, there has been no established evaluation of NQs against mycobacteriosis, the purpose of the present evening symposium was to evaluate the role of NQs at present in the treatment of mycobacteriosis, as well as to present future prospects. Four speakers made presentations. Dr. Chiaki Sano reported that STFX, GFLX, MXFX, and SPFX had a potent antibacterial activity against various acid-fast bacteria and were particularly effective against M. tuberculosis, M. kansasii, and M. fortuitum. Among these drugs, MXFX had a greater therapeutic effect in experimental mice model of a tuberculosis than SM when used concomitantly with INH + RPT. These results suggested that MXFX might become one of the first-line drugs, taking the place of SM. However, OFLX, SPFX, and STFX are not effective against MAC. Only MXFX exhibited a significant therapeutic effect when administered alone and potent therapeutic effect when used concomitantly with EB, in experimental mice model of MAC infection. These results suggested that 8-methoxy quinolone might be effective. Dr. Yuka Sasaki reported the results of a questionnaire survey among national sanatoriums, as well as the current status of administration of NQs for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis based on the results of her study. The ATS recommended in 2002 that LVFX, MXFX, and GFLX be second-line drugs, which should be used alternatively only when first-line drugs cannot be used due to drug-resistant M. tuberculosis or adverse reactions. She reported that LVFX, MXFX, and GFLX were used in a similar manner also in Japan and that they achieved therapeutic results equivalent to those by first-line drugs. She stated that there were some urgent problems, for example, these drugs are not listed in the Tuberculosis Control Law of Japan or in health insurance, and no testing system for sensitivity to NQs has been established. Dr. Atsuyuki Kurashima reported the results of a study conducted in other countries and his study on atypical acid-fast bacteria. He indicated the position of NQs in the treatment of pulmonary atypical mycobacteriosis. However, the significance of concomitant use of CPFX with RFP + EB in the treatment of MAC disease associated with AIDS has already been recognized. He was of the opinion that atypical acid-fast bacteria against which NQs were useful were M. kansasii and M. fortuitum alone at present and that NQs had a very limited effect in the treatment of pulmonary MAC infection, although there were only an insufficient number of studies on pulmonary MAC disease. Dr. Koichi Wada reported on the advisability of administration of NQs in the treatment of mycobacteriosis as a whole and prospects for NQs. His conclusion was similar to those by the two former speakers: he stated that NQs are important for the treatment of tuberculosis as alternative drugs and that they should be used in sufficient doses when first-line drugs could not be used due to drug resistance or adverse reactions. He also stated that use of NQs, including duration of administration, should be discussed after the testing method for drug sensitivity has been established and that long-term use of NQs should be avoided in the treatment of atypical mycobacteriosis at present, although significant results have not been obtained in atypical acid-fast bacteria, mainly MAC. In the last part of the symposium, an active discussion was held. Many opinions similar to those of the speakers were expressed also from the floor. Lastly, President Dr. Matsushima summarized the role of NQs in the treatment of mycobacteriosis at present and future prospects for NQs and confirmed the significance of having held the present symposium.
新型喹诺酮类药物(NQs)对革兰氏阳性球菌已具备强大的抗菌活性,与旧型喹诺酮类药物相比,其在器官中的渗透效果良好。它们的适应证已扩展至治疗由革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性细菌引起的呼吸道感染,并且已经考虑了其用于治疗分枝杆菌病的可能性。预计NQs有效的分枝杆菌病包括结核病(其中存在多重耐药菌问题)和非典型分枝杆菌病(对此几乎没有治疗方法)。由于尚未建立针对分枝杆菌病的NQs的既定评估方法,本次晚间研讨会的目的是评估NQs目前在分枝杆菌病治疗中的作用,并展示未来前景。四位演讲者进行了发言。佐野千秋博士报告称,司帕沙星(STFX)、吉米沙星(GFLX)、莫西沙星(MXFX)和加替沙星(SPFX)对各种抗酸菌具有强大的抗菌活性,对结核分枝杆菌、堪萨斯分枝杆菌和偶然分枝杆菌尤其有效。在这些药物中,与异烟肼 + 利福平(INH + RPT)联合使用时,莫西沙星在结核病实验小鼠模型中的治疗效果比链霉素(SM)更好。这些结果表明,莫西沙星可能会取代链霉素成为一线药物之一。然而,氧氟沙星(OFLX)、加替沙星和司帕沙星对鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)无效。在MAC感染的实验小鼠模型中,只有莫西沙星单独给药时表现出显著的治疗效果,与乙胺丁醇(EB)联合使用时表现出强大的治疗效果。这些结果表明8 - 甲氧基喹诺酮可能有效。佐佐木由香博士报告了对全国疗养院的问卷调查结果,以及基于她的研究结果的NQs用于治疗肺结核的给药现状。美国胸科学会(ATS)在2002年建议将左氧氟沙星(LVFX)、莫西沙星和吉米沙星作为二线药物,仅在由于耐多药结核分枝杆菌或不良反应而无法使用一线药物时才可交替使用。她报告称,在日本,左氧氟沙星、莫西沙星和吉米沙星的使用方式类似,并取得了与一线药物相当的治疗效果。她指出存在一些紧迫问题,例如这些药物未被列入日本的《结核病防治法》或医疗保险中,并且尚未建立NQs的药敏检测系统。仓岛敦之博士报告了在其他国家进行的一项研究结果以及他对非典型抗酸菌的研究。他指出了NQs在肺部非典型分枝杆菌病治疗中的地位。然而,环丙沙星(CPFX)与利福平 + 乙胺丁醇联合用于治疗与艾滋病相关的MAC疾病的意义已经得到认可。他认为目前NQs对其有用的非典型抗酸菌仅为堪萨斯分枝杆菌和偶然分枝杆菌,并且尽管关于肺部MAC疾病的研究数量不足,但NQs在肺部MAC感染的治疗中效果非常有限。和田浩一博士报告了NQs用于整个分枝杆菌病治疗的合理性以及NQs的前景。他的结论与前两位发言者相似:他表示NQs作为替代药物对结核病治疗很重要,并且当由于耐药性或不良反应而无法使用一线药物时,应足量使用。他还表示,在建立药敏检测方法后应讨论NQs的使用,包括给药持续时间,并且目前在非典型分枝杆菌病的治疗中应避免长期使用NQs,尽管在主要为MAC的非典型抗酸菌中尚未获得显著结果。在研讨会的最后部分,进行了热烈的讨论。听众也表达了许多与发言者类似的观点。最后,松岛会长总结了NQs目前在分枝杆菌病治疗中的作用以及NQs的未来前景,并确认了举办本次研讨会的意义。