Suppr超能文献

透析器再处理热消毒的临床经验。

Clinical experience with heat sterilization for reprocessing dialyzers.

作者信息

Kaufman A M, Frinak S, Godmere R O, Levin N W

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York 10128.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 1992 Jul-Sep;38(3):M338-40. doi: 10.1097/00002480-199207000-00050.

Abstract

Use of heat sterilization for dialysis reprocessing offers significant advantages over chemical germicides. Polysulfone dialyzers (Fresenius 60M or 80M) can be sterilized by heating to 105 degrees C for 20 hr, thus permitting clinical trials of this method. One hundred eighty patients received 9,000 treatments. Pyrogenic reactions, sepsis, and subjective symptoms have not occurred. In vitro clearances (Qb 500 ml/min, Qd 800 ml/min) at baseline and after 2-8 uses did not differ (340 +/- 29 vs. 352 +/- 4 ml/min, respectively). KoA determined in vivo did not decrease (baseline 709 +/- 131 vs. 7th use 632 +/- 50 ml/min). Kt/V for urea was not different in 18 patients treated with heat sterilized dialyzers over 6 months when compared with a baseline period with formaldehyde sterilized dialyzers (1.37 +/- 0.12 vs. 1.32 +/- 0.11 at similar time and blood flows). Mean use number was 7.4 (dialyzers limited to 11 uses). Of discarded dialyzers, 44% failed a bedside integrity test (blood side pressurized at > 400 mmHg for 1 min), 36% failed automated fiber bundle or pressure holding tests, 8% had a blood leak, and 12% reached 11 uses. Clinical blood leaks occur in < 0.5% of treatments. Heat sterilization is a safe and effective method of dialysis reprocessing, but quality control of the process is essential. Based on initial clinical experience, heat sterilization of dialyzers for reuse is a promising alternative to chemical disinfection.

摘要

与化学杀菌剂相比,使用热消毒法进行透析器再处理具有显著优势。聚砜透析器(费森尤斯60M或80M)可通过加热至105摄氏度并保持20小时进行消毒,从而使该方法能够进行临床试验。180名患者接受了9000次治疗。未发生热原反应、败血症和主观症状。基线时以及使用2至8次后的体外清除率(血流量Qb为500毫升/分钟,透析液流量Qd为800毫升/分钟)没有差异(分别为340±29与352±4毫升/分钟)。体内测定的滤过面积系数(KoA)没有降低(基线时为709±131,第7次使用时为632±50毫升/分钟)。在6个月内使用热消毒透析器治疗的18名患者中,尿素的Kt/V与使用甲醛消毒透析器的基线期相比没有差异(在相似的时间和血流量下,分别为1.37±0.12与1.32±0.11)。平均使用次数为7.4次(透析器限制使用11次)。在废弃的透析器中,44%未通过床边完整性测试(血液侧在>400 mmHg压力下保持1分钟),36%未通过自动纤维束或压力保持测试,8%发生血液泄漏,12%达到11次使用次数。临床血液泄漏发生率低于0.5%。热消毒是一种安全有效的透析器再处理方法,但该过程的质量控制至关重要。基于初步临床经验,对透析器进行热消毒以供重复使用是化学消毒的一种有前景的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验