Dziewas Rainer, Konrad Carsten, Dräger Bianca, Evers Stefan, Besselmann Michael, Lüdemann Peter, Kuhlenbäumer Gregor, Stögbauer Florian, Ringelstein E Bernd
Dept. of Neurology, University Hospital of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 33, 48129 Münster, Germany.
J Neurol. 2003 Oct;250(10):1179-84. doi: 10.1007/s00415-003-0174-5.
The highly variable clinical course of cervical artery dissections still poses a major challenge to the treating physician. This study was conducted (1) to describe the differences in clinical and angiographic presentation of patients with carotid and vertebral artery dissections (CAD, VAD), (2) to define the circumstances that are related to bilateral arterial dissections, and (3) to determine factors that predict a poor outcome. Retrospectively and by standardised interview, we studied 126 patients with cervical artery dissections. Preceding traumata, vascular risk factors, presenting local and ischemic symptoms, and patient-outcome were evaluated. Patients with CAD presented more often with a partial Horner's syndrome and had a higher prevalence of fibromuscular dysplasia than patients with VAD. Patients with VAD complained more often of neck pain, more frequently reported a preceding chiropractic manipulation and had a higher incidence of bilateral dissections than patients with CAD. Bilateral VAD was significantly related to a preceding chiropractic manipulation. Multivariate analysis showed that the variables stroke and arterial occlusion were the only independent factors associated with a poor outcome. This study emphasises the potential dangers of chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine. Probably owing to the systematic use of forceful neck-rotation to both sides, this treatment was significantly associated with bilateral VAD. Patients with dissection-related cervical artery occlusion had a significantly increased risk of suffering a disabling stroke.
颈动脉夹层的临床病程高度多变,这仍然给主治医生带来重大挑战。开展本研究的目的在于:(1)描述颈动脉夹层(CAD)和椎动脉夹层(VAD)患者在临床及血管造影表现上的差异;(2)明确与双侧动脉夹层相关的情况;(3)确定预测不良预后的因素。我们采用回顾性研究并通过标准化访谈,对126例颈动脉夹层患者进行了研究。评估了其既往创伤、血管危险因素、出现的局部及缺血性症状以及患者预后情况。与VAD患者相比,CAD患者更常出现部分霍纳综合征,纤维肌发育异常的患病率更高。与CAD患者相比,VAD患者更常诉说颈部疼痛,更频繁地报告有过整脊治疗,双侧夹层的发生率更高。双侧VAD与既往整脊治疗显著相关。多变量分析显示,中风和动脉闭塞这两个变量是与不良预后相关的仅有的独立因素。本研究强调了颈椎整脊治疗的潜在风险。可能由于系统性地对双侧进行强力颈部旋转,这种治疗与双侧VAD显著相关。与夹层相关的颈动脉闭塞患者发生致残性中风的风险显著增加。