From the Department of Neurology, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France (Y.B., C.A.-E., M.G.); Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Inserm U744, Pasteur Institute, Lille, France (S.D., J.D.); Department of Neurology, EA1046, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France (S.D., D.L.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurology Clinic, Brescia University Hospital, Brescia, Italy (A.P.); Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (T.T., T.M., A.M.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland (S.E., P.L.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (C.G.-G., M.K.); Department of Neurology, Sainte-Anne University Hospital, Paris, France (E.T.); Department of Neurology, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy (M.S.); Stroke Unit, Perugia University Hospital, Italy (V.C.); and Laboratory of Experimental Neurology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium (M.P., S.A.).
Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):37-41. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001654. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
Little is known about factors contributing to multiple rather than single cervical artery dissections (CeAD) and their associated prognosis.
We compared the baseline characteristics and short-term outcome of patients with multiple to single CeAD included in the multicenter Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic Stroke Patients (CADISP) study.
Among the 983 patients with CeAD, 149 (15.2%) presented with multiple CeAD. Multiple CeADs were more often associated with cervical pain at admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.30), a remote history of head or neck surgery (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.16-3.00), a recent infection (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.12-2.61), and cervical manipulation (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.26-3.95). On imaging, cervical fibromuscular dysplasia (OR, 3.97; 95% CI, 2.04-7.74) and the presence of a pseudoaneurysm (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.86-4.57) were more often seen in patients with multiple CeAD. The presence of multiple rather than single CeAD had no effect on functional 3-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, ≥3; 12% in multiple CeAD versus 11.9% in single CeAD; OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.60-2.41).
In the largest published series of patients with CeAD, we highlighted significant differences between multiple and single artery involvement. Features suggestive of an underlying vasculopathy (fibromuscular dysplasia) and environmental triggers (recent infection, cervical manipulation, and a remote history of head or neck surgery) were preferentially associated with multiple CeAD.
关于导致多发性而非单发性颈内动脉夹层(CeAD)的因素及其相关预后,目前知之甚少。
我们比较了纳入多中心颈内动脉夹层和缺血性卒患者(CADISP)研究的多发性和单发性 CeAD 患者的基线特征和短期预后。
在 983 例 CeAD 患者中,149 例(15.2%)表现为多发性 CeAD。多发性 CeAD 更常伴有入院时的颈痛(优势比 [OR],1.59;95%置信区间 [CI],1.10-2.30)、头颈部手术的既往史(OR,1.87;95%CI,1.16-3.00)、近期感染(OR,1.71;95%CI,1.12-2.61)和颈椎手法治疗(OR,2.23;95%CI,1.26-3.95)。在影像学上,颈纤维肌发育不良(OR,3.97;95%CI,2.04-7.74)和假性动脉瘤的存在(OR,2.91;95%CI,1.86-4.57)更常发生于多发性 CeAD 患者。多发性 CeAD 与单发性 CeAD 相比,对 3 个月时的功能结局(改良 Rankin 量表评分,≥3 分;多发性 CeAD 中为 12%,单发性 CeAD 中为 11.9%;OR,1.20;95%CI,0.60-2.41)并无影响。
在最大的已发表的 CeAD 患者系列中,我们强调了多发性和单发性动脉受累之间的显著差异。提示潜在血管病变(纤维肌发育不良)和环境触发因素(近期感染、颈椎手法治疗和头颈部手术的既往史)的特征与多发性 CeAD 更相关。