Critical care: how should we evaluate our progress?

OBJECTIVE

Review of the history and accomplishments of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) to determine appropriate directions for the future.

DATA SOURCES

Historical documents of the SCCM, Critical Care Medicine, bioethics and healthcare financing literature, Instant Library of Quotations.

STUDY SELECTION

Identified (by the author) material containing specific statements concerning goals and objectives at the time of the founding of the SCCM and at intervals. Material supporting and criticizing predictive indices were identified and bioethical treatises concerning patient autonomy and quality-of-life decisions were chosen.

DATA EXTRACTION

Presidential addresses of the first three SCCM presidents, material relevant to preservation of life and alleviation of suffering from bioethical and healthcare financing perspectives. Relevant quotations.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Initial goals and objectives were identified. Societal and economic factors changing critical care were analyzed for their effect on current and future SCCM directions and objectives.

CONCLUSIONS

The founding members set important goals for critical care and patient care, research, education, and organization. From a perspective of what was foreseeable, these goals have been accomplished to an admirable degree. The SCCM has responded to these goals by providing educational programs and fostering research, especially in its annual meetings and through the publication of guidelines in Critical Care Medicine. The SCCM members would do well to read the first three presidential addresses to experience the eloquence and foresight firsthand, particularly with respect to the founders' spirit, considerations of training, scope of care, humanism, organization and relations within and outside of critical care, integration of care, and development of the scientific process at the bedside. There have been major changes in society since the SCCM was founded: the maturation of the concept of patient's autonomy; recognition of quality-of-life values; healthcare financing; and legal and ethical aspects of care. The critical care profession in general, and the SCCM specifically, should seek to develop effective cost-containment strategies and severity of illness or predictive indices. The SCCM should also educate the professions with respect to ethical issues and provide information directly to the public, especially in the areas of advance directives and withholding and withdrawing care. Through these contributions, the SCCM can assume its proper leadership role within medicine, but, of greater importance, in society. In doing so, societal myths and misunderstandings of the capabilities, futility, role, and limitations of critical care can be corrected. The organization and structure of the SCCM are well developed to accomplish these ends. The SCCM leaders are both able and willing. The objectives seem reasonable and should be attainable.