• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

何时准确性有害,何时有益:婚姻互动中移情准确性模型的一项检验。

When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: a test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions.

作者信息

Simpson Jeffry A, Orina M Minda, Ickes William

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 76109, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):881-93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.881.

DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.881
PMID:14599251
Abstract

This study tested predictions from W. Ickes and J. A. Simpson's (1997, 2001) empathic accuracy model. Married couples were videotaped as they tried to resolve a problem in their marriage. Both spouses then viewed a videotape of the interaction, recorded the thoughts and feelings they had at specific time points, and tried to infer their partner's thoughts and feelings. Consistent with the model, when the partner's thoughts and feelings were relationship-threatening (as rated by both the partners and by trained observers), greater empathic accuracy on the part of the perceiver was associated with pre-to-posttest declines in the perceiver's feelings of subjective closeness. The reverse was true when the partner's thoughts and feelings were nonthreatening. Exploratory analyses revealed that these effects were partially mediated through observer ratings of the degree to which partners tried to avoid the discussion issue.

摘要

本研究检验了W. 伊克斯和J. A. 辛普森(1997年、2001年)的共情准确性模型所做出的预测。研究人员对已婚夫妇解决婚姻问题的过程进行了录像。之后,夫妻双方观看互动录像,记录他们在特定时间点的想法和感受,并尝试推断伴侣的想法和感受。与该模型一致的是,当伴侣的想法和感受对关系构成威胁时(由伴侣双方和训练有素的观察者评定),感知者更高的共情准确性与测试前后感知者主观亲密感的下降相关。当伴侣的想法和感受不构成威胁时,情况则相反。探索性分析表明,这些效应部分是通过观察者对伴侣试图回避讨论问题程度的评定来介导的。

相似文献

1
When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: a test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions.何时准确性有害,何时有益:婚姻互动中移情准确性模型的一项检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):881-93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.881.
2
Individual and relational correlates of pain-related empathic accuracy in spouses of chronic pain patients.慢性疼痛患者配偶中与疼痛相关的共情准确性的个体及关系相关因素。
Clin J Pain. 2008 Oct;24(8):669-77. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318173c28f.
3
Attachment and the management of empathic accuracy in relationship-threatening situations.在关系受威胁的情况下的依恋与共情准确性的管理。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Feb;37(2):242-54. doi: 10.1177/0146167210394368.
4
Correlates of spousal empathic accuracy for pain-related thoughts and feelings.配偶对疼痛相关想法和感受的共情准确性的相关因素。
Clin J Pain. 2013 Apr;29(4):324-33. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182527bfd.
5
Predictors of intimacy in couples' discussions of relationship injuries: an observational study.情侣关系中伤害事件讨论时亲密程度的预测因素:一项观察性研究。
J Fam Psychol. 2008 Feb;22(1):21-9. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.21.
6
Perceived criticism: associations with perceiver characteristics and interpersonal behaviour.感知到的批评:与感知者特征和人际行为的关联。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Dec 30;170(2-3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.09.007. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
7
Depression and empathic accuracy in couples: an interpersonal model of gender differences in depression.夫妻中的抑郁和共情准确性:抑郁的性别差异的人际模型。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Aug;22(8):1033-41. doi: 10.1177/0956797611414728. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
8
Man, I feel like a woman: when and how gender-role motivation helps mind-reading.我感觉像个女人:性别角色动机何时以及如何有助于读心术。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1165-79. doi: 10.1037/a0013067.
9
Sources of accuracy in the empathic accuracy paradigm.共情准确性范式中的准确性来源。
Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):438-46. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.438.
10
Trust and partner-enhancing attributions in close relationships.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Jun;30(6):695-705. doi: 10.1177/0146167203262803.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy and bias in the perceptions of partner's negative emotions: the role of trait mindfulness.对伴侣负面情绪认知的准确性与偏差:特质正念的作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 22;15(1):9977. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94581-2.
2
Caregiver Assessment of Socioemotional Functioning in People Living With Neurodegenerative Disease (Part 1): Construct Validity of a New Measure.神经退行性疾病患者社会情感功能的照顾者评估(第1部分):一种新测量方法的结构效度
Gerontologist. 2025 Apr 9;65(5). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf054.
3
Ability-Related Emotional Intelligence: An Introduction.
与能力相关的情商:引言
J Intell. 2024 May 19;12(5):51. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12050051.
4
Exploring Actual and Presumed Links between Accurately Inferring Contents of Other People's Minds and Prosocial Outcomes.探索准确推断他人心理内容与亲社会结果之间的实际及假定联系。
J Intell. 2024 Jan 26;12(2):13. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12020013.
5
Relational needs frustration: an observational study on the role of negative (dis)engaging emotions.关系需求受挫:关于消极(脱离)参与情绪作用的一项观察性研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1232125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232125. eCollection 2023.
6
Embracing the Emotion in Emotional Intelligence Measurement: Insights from Emotion Theory and Research.在情商测量中接纳情感:来自情感理论与研究的见解
J Intell. 2023 Nov 1;11(11):210. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11110210.
7
The Meso-Expression Test (MET): A Novel Assessment of Emotion Perception.中观表情测试(MET):一种情感感知的新型评估方法。
J Intell. 2023 Jul 19;11(7):145. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11070145.
8
A shared love: reciprocity and hopefulness in romantic relationships of young adults with chronic pain.一种共同的爱:慢性疼痛的年轻人浪漫关系中的互惠与希望
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 14;4:1179516. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1179516. eCollection 2023.
9
Motivation and empathic accuracy during conflict interactions in couples: it's complicated!夫妻冲突互动中的动机与共情准确性:情况很复杂!
Motiv Emot. 2023;47(2):208-228. doi: 10.1007/s11031-022-09982-x. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
10
Social Functioning in Individuals Affected by Childhood Maltreatment: Establishing a Research Agenda to Inform Interventions.受童年期虐待影响的个体的社会功能:制定干预措施的研究议程。
Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(4):238-251. doi: 10.1159/000523667. Epub 2022 Apr 5.