• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Embracing the Emotion in Emotional Intelligence Measurement: Insights from Emotion Theory and Research.在情商测量中接纳情感:来自情感理论与研究的见解
J Intell. 2023 Nov 1;11(11):210. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11110210.
2
The Geneva Emotional Competence Test (GECo): An ability measure of workplace emotional intelligence.日内瓦情绪能力测试(GECo):一种职场情绪智力的能力衡量工具。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Apr;104(4):559-580. doi: 10.1037/apl0000365. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Validity evidence for the situational judgment test paradigm in emotional intelligence measurement.情境判断测验范式在情绪智力测量中的有效性证据。
Int J Psychol. 2012;47(6):438-47. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.682063. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
4
A neuro-cognitive process model of emotional intelligence.情商的神经认知过程模型。
Biol Psychol. 2018 Nov;139:131-151. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
5
Measurement of ability emotional intelligence: results for two new tests.情绪智力能力的测量:两个新测试的结果。
Br J Psychol. 2010 Aug;101(Pt 3):563-78. doi: 10.1348/000712609X474370. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
6
QEPro: An ability measure of emotional intelligence for managers in a French cultural environment.QEPro:法国文化环境中管理者情商的一种能力度量。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(5):4080-4102. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01715-6. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
7
Psychological and physical well-being of Lithuanian youth: Relation to emotional intelligence.立陶宛青年的心理和身体健康:与情商的关系。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2017;53(4):277-284. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
8
Emotionally Intelligent People Use More High-Engagement and Less Low-Engagement Processes to Regulate Others' Emotions.情商高的人在调节他人情绪时,更多地采用高投入度的方式,而较少采用低投入度的方式。
J Intell. 2022 Sep 29;10(4):76. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040076.
9
Ability-Based Emotional Intelligence Is Associated With Greater Cardiac Vagal Control and Reactivity.基于能力的情商与更强的心脏迷走神经控制和反应性相关。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jun 11;13:181. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00181. eCollection 2019.
10
Putting 'Emotional Intelligences' in Their Place: Introducing the Integrated Model of Affect-Related Individual Differences.为“情绪智力”正位:引入情感相关个体差异的整合模型。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 14;9:2155. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02155. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Large language models are proficient in solving and creating emotional intelligence tests.大型语言模型擅长解决和创建情商测试。
Commun Psychol. 2025 May 21;3(1):80. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00258-x.
2
Effects of Physical Exercise on Emotional Intelligence from Birth to Adolescence: A Systematic Review Protocol.从出生到青春期体育锻炼对情商的影响:一项系统评价方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 4;12(23):2437. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232437.
3
Exploring emotional intelligence in artificial intelligence systems: a comprehensive analysis of emotion recognition and response mechanisms.探索人工智能系统中的情商:对情感识别与反应机制的全面分析。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Jun 21;86(8):4657-4663. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002315. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Designing and evaluating tasks to measure individual differences in experimental psychology: a tutorial.设计和评估实验心理学中个体差异测量任务:教程。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Feb 27;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00540-2.
5
Exploring Actual and Presumed Links between Accurately Inferring Contents of Other People's Minds and Prosocial Outcomes.探索准确推断他人心理内容与亲社会结果之间的实际及假定联系。
J Intell. 2024 Jan 26;12(2):13. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12020013.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconceptualizing Emotion Recognition Ability.重新认识情绪识别能力。
J Intell. 2023 Jun 19;11(6):123. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060123.
2
Emotional intelligence matters in hospitality education: contributions of emotional intelligence, fluid ability, and personality to hospitality grades.情商在酒店管理教育中至关重要:情商、流体智力和个性对酒店管理课程成绩的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 26;14:1148863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148863. eCollection 2023.
3
Reappraising reappraisal: an expanded view.再评价再评价:一个扩展的视角。
Cogn Emot. 2023 May-Jun;37(3):357-370. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2023.2208340. Epub 2023 May 10.
4
Emotional intelligence and emotion information processing: Proof of concept of a test measuring accuracy in discriminating emotions.情商与情绪信息处理:一项测量情绪辨别准确性的测试的概念验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 3;14:1085971. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1085971. eCollection 2023.
5
The Process Model of Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Assessing Individual Differences in Strategy Stage and Orientation.情绪调节问卷的过程模型:评估策略阶段和取向的个体差异。
Assessment. 2023 Oct;30(7):2090-2114. doi: 10.1177/10731911221134601. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
6
Emotionally Intelligent People Use More High-Engagement and Less Low-Engagement Processes to Regulate Others' Emotions.情商高的人在调节他人情绪时,更多地采用高投入度的方式,而较少采用低投入度的方式。
J Intell. 2022 Sep 29;10(4):76. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040076.
7
Interpersonal Emotion Regulation: an Experience Sampling Study.人际情绪调节:一项经验抽样研究。
Affect Sci. 2021 May 3;2(3):273-288. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00044-y. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
Assessing Emotional Intelligence Abilities, Acquiescent and Extreme Responding in Situational Judgment Tests Using Principal Component Metrics.使用主成分指标评估情境判断测试中的情商能力、默认反应和极端反应。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 26;13:813540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813540. eCollection 2022.
9
The Scoring Challenge of Emotional Intelligence Ability Tests: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach to Model Substantive and Method Effects Using Raw Item Scores.情商能力测试的计分挑战:一种使用原始项目分数对模型实质效应和方法效应进行验证性因素分析的方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 10;13:812525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812525. eCollection 2022.
10
Infusing Context Into Emotion Perception Impacts Emotion Decoding Accuracy.将语境融入情绪感知会影响情绪解码的准确性。
Exp Psychol. 2021 Nov;68(6):285-294. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000531.

在情商测量中接纳情感:来自情感理论与研究的见解

Embracing the Emotion in Emotional Intelligence Measurement: Insights from Emotion Theory and Research.

作者信息

Mortillaro Marcello, Schlegel Katja

机构信息

Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.

Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Intell. 2023 Nov 1;11(11):210. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11110210.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence11110210
PMID:37998709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10672494/
Abstract

Emotional intelligence (EI) has gained significant popularity as a scientific construct over the past three decades, yet its conceptualization and measurement still face limitations. Applied EI research often overlooks its components, treating it as a global characteristic, and there are few widely used performance-based tests for assessing ability EI. The present paper proposes avenues for advancing ability EI measurement by connecting the main EI components to models and theories from the emotion science literature and related fields. For emotion understanding and emotion recognition, we discuss the implications of basic emotion theory, dimensional models, and appraisal models of emotion for creating stimuli, scenarios, and response options. For the regulation and management of one's own and others' emotions, we discuss how the process model of emotion regulation and its extensions to interpersonal processes can inform the creation of situational judgment items. In addition, we emphasize the importance of incorporating context, cross-cultural variability, and attentional and motivational factors into future models and measures of ability EI. We hope this article will foster exchange among scholars in the fields of ability EI, basic emotion science, social cognition, and emotion regulation, leading to an enhanced understanding of the individual differences in successful emotional functioning and communication.

摘要

在过去三十年里,情商(EI)作为一种科学概念已广受欢迎,但其概念化和测量仍存在局限性。应用情商研究常常忽视其组成部分,将其视为一种整体特征,而且几乎没有广泛使用的基于表现的测试来评估能力情商。本文通过将主要的情商组成部分与情感科学文献及相关领域的模型和理论相联系,提出了推进能力情商测量的途径。对于情绪理解和情绪识别,我们讨论了基本情绪理论、维度模型和情绪评估模型对创建刺激、情景和反应选项的影响。对于自身和他人情绪的调节与管理,我们讨论了情绪调节的过程模型及其对人际过程的扩展如何为情景判断项目的创建提供信息。此外,我们强调将情境、跨文化变异性以及注意力和动机因素纳入未来能力情商模型和测量中的重要性。我们希望本文能促进能力情商、基本情绪科学、社会认知和情绪调节等领域学者之间的交流,从而增进对成功情绪功能和沟通中个体差异的理解。