Burke Darren G, Chilibeck Philip D, Parise Gianni, Candow Darren G, Mahoney Douglas, Tarnopolsky Mark
Department of Human Kinetics, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Nov;35(11):1946-55. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000093614.17517.79.
To compare the change in muscle creatine, fiber morphology, body composition, hydration status, and exercise performance between vegetarians and nonvegetarians with 8 wk of creatine supplementation and resistance training.
Eighteen VG and 24 NV subjects (19-55 yr) were randomly assigned (double blind) to four groups: VG + creatine (VGCr, N=10), VG + placebo (VGPl, N=8), NV + creatine (NVCr, N=12), and NV + placebo (NVPl, N=12). Before and at the end of the study, muscle biopsies were taken from the vastus lateralis m, body composition was assessed by DXA, and strength was assessed using 1-RM bench press and leg press. Subjects participated in the same 8-wk resistance-training program. Creatine dosage was based on lean tissue mass (0.25 g.kg(-1) LTM.d(-1) x 7 d; 0.0625 g.kg(-1) LTM.d(-1) x 49 d).
Biopsy samples indicated that total creatine (TCr=free Cr + PCr) was significantly lower in VG compared with NV at baseline (VG=117 mmol.kg(-1); NV=130 mmol.kg(-1); P<0.05). For Cr subjects, there was a greater increase in PCr, TCr, bench-press strength, isokinetic work, Type II fiber area, and whole-body lean tissue compared with subjects on placebo (P<0.05). Vegetarians who took Cr had a greater increase in TCr, PCr, lean tissue, and total work performance than nonvegetarians who took Cr (P<0.05). The change in muscle TCr was significantly correlated with initial muscle TCr, and the change in lean tissue mass and exercise performance. These findings confirm an ergogenic effect of Cr during resistance training and suggest that subjects with initially low levels of intramuscular Cr (vegetarians) are more responsive to supplementation.
比较素食者和非素食者在补充肌酸8周并进行抗阻训练后,肌肉肌酸、纤维形态、身体成分、水合状态及运动表现的变化。
18名素食者(VG)和24名非素食者(19 - 55岁)被随机(双盲)分为四组:素食者 + 肌酸(VGCr,N = 10)、素食者 + 安慰剂(VGPl,N = 8)、非素食者 + 肌酸(NVCr,N = 12)、非素食者 + 安慰剂(NVPl,N = 12)。在研究开始前和结束时,从股外侧肌取肌肉活检样本,通过双能X线吸收法评估身体成分,使用1次重复最大值卧推和腿举评估力量。受试者参与相同的8周抗阻训练计划。肌酸剂量基于去脂体重(0.25 g·kg⁻¹去脂体重·天⁻¹×7天;0.0625 g·kg⁻¹去脂体重·天⁻¹×49天)。
活检样本表明,在基线时,素食者的总肌酸(TCr = 游离肌酸 + 磷酸肌酸)显著低于非素食者(素食者 = 117 mmol·kg⁻¹;非素食者 = 130 mmol·kg⁻¹;P < 0.05)。对于服用肌酸的受试者,与服用安慰剂的受试者相比,磷酸肌酸、总肌酸、卧推力量、等速功、II型纤维面积和全身去脂体重有更大增加(P < 0.05)。服用肌酸的素食者比服用肌酸的非素食者在总肌酸、磷酸肌酸、去脂体重和总运动表现方面有更大增加(P < 0.05)。肌肉总肌酸的变化与初始肌肉总肌酸、去脂体重变化和运动表现显著相关。这些发现证实了肌酸在抗阻训练中的促力作用,并表明初始肌肉肌酸水平较低的受试者(素食者)对补充剂更敏感。