• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patients' views of a pharmacist-run medication review clinic in general practice.患者对全科医疗中由药剂师管理的药物评估诊所的看法。
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Aug;53(493):607-13.
2
Issues with prescribed medications in Aboriginal communities: Aboriginal health workers' perspectives.原住民社区中处方药的问题:原住民卫生工作者的观点。
Rural Remote Health. 2006 Apr-Jun;6(2):557. Epub 2006 May 9.
3
Pharmacists' and patients' roles in the pharmacist-patient relationship: are pharmacists and patients reading from the same relationship script?药剂师与患者在医患关系中的角色:药剂师和患者是否遵循相同的关系脚本?
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2007 Mar;3(1):47-69. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2006.03.003.
4
Who should give lifestyle advice in general practice and what factors influence attendance at health promotion clinics? Survey of patients' views.在全科医疗中应由谁提供生活方式建议,以及哪些因素会影响人们前往健康促进诊所就诊?患者观点调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Dec;45(401):669-71.
5
Pharmacists' views on Indigenous health: is there more that can be done?药剂师对原住民健康的看法:还有更多可做的吗?
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Jul-Sep;7(3):743. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
6
[Home visits by a pharmacist after discharge from hospital].[出院后药剂师的家访]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 Feb 28;128(5):567-9.
7
Physician-patient and pharmacist-patient communication: geriatrics' perceptions and opinions.医患及药剂师与患者的沟通:老年医学的认知与观点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 May;71(2):265-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
8
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
9
Electronic transfer of prescription-related information: comparing views of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists.处方相关信息的电子传输:比较患者、全科医生和药剂师的观点。
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Mar;53(488):204-9.
10
Role of pharmacist counseling in preventing adverse drug events after hospitalization.药师咨询在预防住院后药物不良事件中的作用。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):565-71. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.565.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives of patients on the role of general practice pharmacists: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.患者对全科药剂师作用的看法:定性研究的系统评价与元综合分析
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Mar 31;26(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02787-0.
2
The integration of hospital pharmacists into primary care settings in Shenzhen, China: a qualitative study.中国深圳医院药师融入基层医疗服务的质性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12351-2.
3
'You would rather not fill your body with pills'-patient perspectives on polypharmacy and medication reviews by pharmacists in general practice.“你宁愿不让自己的身体塞满药丸”——患者对综合医疗中多药合用及药剂师药物评估的看法
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Jun;43(2):411-421. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2025.2451660. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
4
Patient experiences and opinions on medication review: a qualitative study.患者对药物审查的体验和看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Jun;45(3):650-658. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01541-9. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
5
Integration of pharmacist independent prescribers into general practice: a mixed-methods study of pharmacists' and patients' views.药剂师独立处方者融入全科医疗:一项关于药剂师和患者观点的混合方法研究。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Jan 19;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00520-9.
6
Patient perceptions and experiences of medication review: qualitative study in general practice.患者对药物审查的看法和体验:一般实践中的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Nov 22;23(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01903-8.
7
Barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of pharmacist services in primary care clinics: a scoping review protocol.在基层医疗诊所中实施药剂师服务的障碍和促进因素:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):e057191. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057191.
8
General practitioners' views of pharmacist services in general practice: a qualitative evidence synthesis.全科医生对全科药学服务的看法:定性证据综合评价。
Fam Pract. 2022 Jul 19;39(4):735-746. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab114.
9
Patients' experiences of pharmacists in general practice: an exploratory qualitative study.患者对全科医生中药剂师的体验:一项探索性定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Mar 5;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01393-0.
10
Community pharmacy teams' experiences of general practice-based pharmacists: an exploratory qualitative study.社区药房团队对基于全科医疗的药剂师的体验:一项探索性定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 18;20(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05245-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomised controlled trial of clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly patients receiving repeat prescriptions in general practice.全科医疗中,药剂师对接受重复处方的老年患者进行临床用药审查的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2001 Dec 8;323(7325):1340-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7325.1340.
2
Pharmacist-led medication review in patients over 65: a randomized, controlled trial in primary care.药剂师主导的65岁以上患者药物评估:一项初级保健中的随机对照试验。
Age Ageing. 2001 May;30(3):205-11. doi: 10.1093/ageing/30.3.205.
3
"No thank you": why elderly patients declined to participate in a research study.“不了,谢谢”:老年患者拒绝参与一项研究的原因
Pharm World Sci. 2001 Feb;23(1):22-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1011276924820.
4
'Strong medicine': an analysis of pharmacist consultations in primary care.“强效药物”:基层医疗中药剂师会诊情况分析
Fam Pract. 2000 Dec;17(6):480-3. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.6.480.
5
Repeat prescribing management--a cause for concern?重复开药管理——值得关注的问题?
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 May;49(442):343-7.
6
Who controls repeats?谁控制重复序列?
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Nov;46(412):643-7.

患者对全科医疗中由药剂师管理的药物评估诊所的看法。

Patients' views of a pharmacist-run medication review clinic in general practice.

作者信息

Petty Duncan R, Knapp Peter, Raynor D K, House Allan O

机构信息

Pharmacy Practice and Medicines Management Group, School of Healthcare Studies, Baines Wing, University of Leeds, PO Box 214, Leeds LS2 9UT.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Aug;53(493):607-13.

PMID:14601336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1314674/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reviewing elderly patients' medication is a requirement of the National Service Framework for Older People. Many general practitioners have insufficient time to review patients' medications in a consultation. Pharmacist review has been offered as an alternative and this will be a new experience for many patients.

AIM

To ascertain patients' views of a pharmacist-conducted medication review clinic, run in their general practice surgery.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Qualitative study using focus group interviews.

SETTING

General practices in Leeds Health Authority area.

METHOD

Patients aged 65 years and over, who had attended a medicine review clinic, took part in focus groups that were recorded and transcribed. Units of information representing an idea were identified and similar ideas were grouped together as themes.

RESULTS

Patients had a number of prior beliefs about the clinic. Most patients knew that the clinic's purpose was to review repeat medication, to find out more about their medicines, and to ask questions about efficacy and side effects. Some patients were suspicious about the purpose of the clinic but others welcomed the opportunity to have an in-depth review and an explanation of their condition and its treatment; some patients did not accept advice or were disappointed that their expectations were not fulfilled. Most patients were happy to attend a yearly review but some expressed guilt about attending the surgery too frequently.

CONCLUSION

Patients who attended the medication review clinics expressed a range of views about the service. Further research into patients' and carers' opinions about medicine review is needed to inform the development of these services.

摘要

背景

审查老年患者的用药情况是《老年人国家服务框架》的一项要求。许多全科医生在诊疗过程中没有足够时间审查患者的用药情况。已提议由药剂师进行审查,而这对许多患者来说将是一种全新体验。

目的

确定患者对在其全科诊所开展的由药剂师主导的用药审查诊所的看法。

研究设计

采用焦点小组访谈的定性研究。

研究地点

利兹卫生局辖区内的全科诊所。

方法

65岁及以上且参加过用药审查诊所的患者参与焦点小组,讨论内容进行录音和转录。确定代表某个观点的信息单元,并将相似观点归为主题。

结果

患者对诊所有一些先入为主的看法。大多数患者知道诊所的目的是审查重复用药情况、了解更多关于其药物的信息以及询问疗效和副作用相关问题。一些患者对诊所的目的持怀疑态度,但另一些患者欢迎有机会进行深入审查并对其病情及治疗情况得到解释;一些患者不接受建议,或者因期望未达成而感到失望。大多数患者乐于参加年度审查,但一些患者对过于频繁前往诊所就诊表示愧疚。

结论

参加用药审查诊所的患者对该项服务表达了一系列看法。需要进一步研究患者及护理人员对用药审查的意见,以为这些服务的发展提供参考。