Gerlach Ferdinand M, Beyer Martin, Szecsenyi Joachim, Raspe Heiner
Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel.
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2003 Oct;97(7):495-501.
The evaluation of disease management programmes is necessary and has been made obligatory in Germany by the Fifth Book of Social Code. So far there has been extensive ambiguity as regards the precise definition of suitable strategies for the evaluation. Considering the scientific evaluation of the diabetes contract in North-Rhine current deficits of the evaluation of already existing programmes for chronically ill patients are exemplarily described. On the basis of international experience reasonable demands are discussed that ought to be accomplished when evaluating the effectiveness and benefit of the programmes. Taking the British Medical Research Council as an example, a four-step model will be suggested as a loophole in the methodological dilemma of varying suitable study designs, which allows for the adequate evaluation of even complex interventions.
疾病管理项目的评估是必要的,并且在德国已被《社会法典》第五卷规定为强制性要求。到目前为止,在评估合适策略的精确定义方面存在广泛的模糊性。考虑到对北莱茵地区糖尿病合同的科学评估,示例性地描述了现有慢性病患者项目评估中当前存在的不足。基于国际经验,讨论了在评估项目的有效性和效益时应该满足的合理要求。以英国医学研究理事会为例,将提出一个四步模型,作为不同合适研究设计方法困境中的一个漏洞,该模型能够对甚至复杂的干预措施进行充分评估。