• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国2型糖尿病患者的疾病管理项目:一项基于人群的纵向描述性研究。

Disease management programs for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Germany: a longitudinal population-based descriptive study.

作者信息

Mehring Michael, Donnachie Ewan, Bonke Florian Cornelius, Werner Christoph, Schneider Antonius

机构信息

Institute of General Practice, Technische Universität München, Orleansstraße 47, 81667 Munich, Germany.

Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of Bavaria, Elsenheimerstraße 39, 80687 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2017 May 18;9:37. doi: 10.1186/s13098-017-0236-y. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s13098-017-0236-y
PMID:28529546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5437566/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of the disease management program (DMP) for patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 is to improve the quality of health care and the treatment process. 12 years after its introduction in Germany, there is still no consensus as to whether DMP has been effective in reaching these goals.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal population-based study between 2004 and 2015 were conducted to evaluate the DMP for type 2 diabetes in Bavaria using routinely collected patient medical records hold from the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of Bavaria.

RESULTS

During the first 12 years of DMP, the number of participants increased continually to reach 580,222 in 2015. The proportion of participants older than 70 years increased during the observation from 41.6 to 51.1%. The percentage of smokers increased slightly from 9 to 11%. Similarly, the distribution of body mass index remained constant with approximately 50% of patients having a body mass index >30 kg/m. Control of HbA1c was without an appreciable change over the course, with between 8.3 and 9.4% of all patients with uncontrolled values higher than 8.5%. Prescription of metformin increased from 40.5% in 2004 to 54.1% in 2015. Among patients receiving insulin, the proportion receiving a combined therapy with metformin increased from 28.4% in 2004 to 50.8% in 2015. In contrast, the percentage with insulin monotherapy decreased from 55.4 to 33.7%. The proportion of patients with a diabetic education increased within the course from 12.8 to 29.3%.

CONCLUSION

Data from the German DMP for type 2 diabetes demonstrates an improvement in the quality of care with respect to pharmacotherapy and patient education and therefore to an improved adherence to guidelines. However, no appreciable improvement was observed with regard to smoking status, obesity or HbA1c control.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病患者疾病管理项目(DMP)的主要目标是提高医疗保健质量和治疗过程。在德国引入该项目12年后,对于DMP是否有效实现这些目标仍未达成共识。

方法

进行了一项2004年至2015年基于人群的回顾性纵向研究,以使用巴伐利亚法定健康保险医师全国协会常规收集的患者病历评估巴伐利亚州的2型糖尿病DMP。

结果

在DMP实施的前12年中,参与者数量持续增加,2015年达到580,222人。70岁以上参与者的比例在观察期间从41.6%增加到51.1%。吸烟者的百分比从9%略有增加到11%。同样,体重指数的分布保持不变,约50%的患者体重指数>30kg/m²。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的控制在整个过程中没有明显变化,所有患者中HbA1c未得到控制(值高于8.5%)的比例在8.3%至9.4%之间。二甲双胍的处方率从2004年的40.5%增加到2015年的54.1%。在接受胰岛素治疗的患者中,接受二甲双胍联合治疗的比例从2004年的28.4%增加到2015年的50.8%。相比之下,单纯胰岛素治疗的比例从55.4%下降到33.7%。接受糖尿病教育的患者比例在过程中从12.8%增加到29.3%。

结论

德国2型糖尿病DMP的数据表明,在药物治疗和患者教育方面护理质量有所提高,因此对指南的依从性也有所提高。然而,在吸烟状况、肥胖或HbA1c控制方面未观察到明显改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc4c/5437566/d3de226cbed5/13098_2017_236_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc4c/5437566/d9ac63f7007e/13098_2017_236_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc4c/5437566/d3de226cbed5/13098_2017_236_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc4c/5437566/d9ac63f7007e/13098_2017_236_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc4c/5437566/d3de226cbed5/13098_2017_236_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Disease management programs for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Germany: a longitudinal population-based descriptive study.德国2型糖尿病患者的疾病管理项目:一项基于人群的纵向描述性研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2017 May 18;9:37. doi: 10.1186/s13098-017-0236-y. eCollection 2017.
2
Disease management programs for patients with COPD in Germany: a longitudinal evaluation of routinely collected patient records.德国慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疾病管理项目:对常规收集的患者记录的纵向评估。
Respir Care. 2014 Jul;59(7):1123-32. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02748. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
3
Disease management programs for patients with asthma in Germany: a longitudinal population-based study.德国哮喘患者疾病管理计划:一项基于人群的纵向研究。
Respir Care. 2013 Jul;58(7):1170-7. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01968.
4
The disease management program for type 2 diabetes in Germany enhances process quality of diabetes care - a follow-up survey of patient's experiences.德国 2 型糖尿病疾病管理项目提高了糖尿病护理的流程质量——基于患者体验的随访调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Mar 3;10:55. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-55.
5
[Evaluating the effectiveness of a disease management program diabetes in the German Statutory Health Insurance: first results and methodological considerations].[评估德国法定医疗保险中糖尿病疾病管理项目的有效性:初步结果与方法学考量]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(9):649-55. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
6
The effectiveness of German disease management programs (DMPs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease: results from an observational longitudinal study.德国疾病管理项目(DMPs)对2型糖尿病和冠心病患者的有效性:一项观察性纵向研究的结果
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2015 Sep 17;7:77. doi: 10.1186/s13098-015-0065-9. eCollection 2015.
7
ELSID-Diabetes study-evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes for patients with type 2 diabetes. Rationale, design and conduct--a study protocol [ISRCTN08471887].ELSID-糖尿病研究——对2型糖尿病患者疾病管理项目大规模实施情况的评估。原理、设计与实施——一项研究方案[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN08471887]
BMC Public Health. 2005 Oct 4;5:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-99.
8
Effect of a Disease Management Program on the Adherence to Guideline-Recommended HbA1c Monitoring in Patients with Diabetes in Slovakia.疾病管理项目对斯洛伐克糖尿病患者遵循指南推荐的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)监测的影响。
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Oct;14(10):1685-1694. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01447-9. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
9
No selection, but higher satisfaction of people participating in the disease management programme diabetes type 2 in Germany.未进行选择,但参与德国 2 型糖尿病疾病管理项目的人群满意度更高。
Acta Diabetol. 2018 Apr;55(4):363-367. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1106-2. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
10
Is there a survival benefit within a German primary care-based disease management program?德国基于初级保健的疾病管理项目是否具有生存获益?
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan;16(1):49-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Data-driven segmentation of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: an observational study on health care utilisation prior to an emergency department visit in Germany.基于数据驱动的2型糖尿病患者细分:德国急诊科就诊前医疗保健利用情况的观察性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 16;12:1509220. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1509220. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of the Impact of Mobile Health App Vitadio in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.移动健康应用程序Vitadio对2型糖尿病患者影响的评估:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 9;27:e68648. doi: 10.2196/68648.
3
Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Hospitalized Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with and without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Observations from the German Claims Data-Based Cohort of the CaReMe-CKD Multinational Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Austrians Disease Management Program in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.奥地利2型糖尿病患者疾病管理项目有效性评估——一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0161429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161429. eCollection 2016.
2
Impact of Disease Management Programs on HbA1c Values in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Germany.疾病管理项目对德国2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白值的影响。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):117-122. doi: 10.1177/1932296816651633. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
3
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2016: Summary of Revisions.
患有和未患有2型糖尿病的住院慢性肾脏病患者的特征与结局:基于德国索赔数据的CaReMe-CKD多国研究队列的观察结果
Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jul 22;16:487-500. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S459767. eCollection 2024.
4
Health-related Quality of Life of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Measured With the Bahasa Indonesia Version of EQ-5D in Primary Care Settings in Indonesia.印度尼西亚初级保健环境中使用印度尼西亚语版 EQ-5D 测量的糖尿病患者健康相关生活质量。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2023 Sep;56(5):467-474. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.23.229. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
5
Trends of Antidiabetic and Cardiovascular Diseases Medication Prescriptions in Type 2 Diabetes between 2005 and 2017-A German Longitudinal Study Based on Claims Data.2005 年至 2017 年期间基于索赔数据的德国纵向研究:2 型糖尿病患者的抗糖尿病和心血管疾病药物处方趋势。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 3;20(5):4491. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054491.
6
Disease Management Program in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, long-term results of the early and established program cohort: A population-based retrospective cohort study.2 型糖尿病患者疾病管理计划:早期和已建立计划队列的长期结果:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 13;17(12):e0279090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279090. eCollection 2022.
7
Patterns and associated factors of diabetes self-management: Results of a latent class analysis in a German population-based study.糖尿病自我管理的模式和相关因素:一项基于德国人群的潜在类别分析研究结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 19;16(3):e0248992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248992. eCollection 2021.
8
Are Disability Rates among People with Diabetes Increasing in Germany? A Decomposition Analysis of Temporal Change between 2004 and 2015.德国的糖尿病患者残疾率是否在上升?2004 年至 2015 年期间变化的分解分析。
J Aging Health. 2021 Mar;33(3-4):205-216. doi: 10.1177/0898264320970324. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
9
Does disease management for diabetic nephropathy reduce medical expenditure? Evidence from a three-period difference-in-differences analysis.糖尿病肾病的疾病管理是否降低了医疗支出?来自三时期差分分析的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 11;20(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05297-0.
10
Participation in structured diabetes mellitus self-management education program and association with lifestyle behavior: results from a population-based study.参与结构化的糖尿病自我管理教育计划与生活方式行为的关联:一项基于人群的研究结果。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001066.
《2016年糖尿病医疗护理标准:修订摘要》
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39 Suppl 1:S4-5. doi: 10.2337/dc16-S003.
4
The effectiveness of German disease management programs (DMPs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease: results from an observational longitudinal study.德国疾病管理项目(DMPs)对2型糖尿病和冠心病患者的有效性:一项观察性纵向研究的结果
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2015 Sep 17;7:77. doi: 10.1186/s13098-015-0065-9. eCollection 2015.
5
Disease management programs for type 2 diabetes in Germany: a systematic literature review evaluating effectiveness.德国 2 型糖尿病疾病管理计划:评估有效性的系统文献回顾
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Jun 27;111(26):453-63. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0453.
6
[The methods within the evaluation of disease management programmes in control-group designs using the example of diabetes mellitus - a systematic literature review].[以糖尿病为例,在使用对照组设计的疾病管理项目评估中的方法——一项系统文献综述]
Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Aug;74(8-9):496-501. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1301273. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
7
Disease management programs in type 2 diabetes: quality of care.2 型糖尿病疾病管理计划:护理质量。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Jun;17(6):393-403.
8
National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2·7 million participants.1980 年以来,空腹血糖和糖尿病患病率的国家、地区和全球趋势:对 370 个国家和地区年以及 270 万参与者的健康检查调查和流行病学研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2011 Jul 2;378(9785):31-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60679-X. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
9
The benefit and efficiency of the disease management program for type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病疾病管理计划的效益和效率。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Mar;108(10):155-62. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0155. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
10
Medical care of type 2 diabetes in German disease management programmes: a population-based evaluation.德国疾病管理计划中的 2 型糖尿病医疗护理:基于人群的评估。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2011 May;27(4):383-91. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.1186.