Joos Stefanie, Rosemann Thomas, Heiderhoff Marc, Wensing Michel, Ludt Sabine, Gensichen Jochen, Kaufmann-Kolle Petra, Szecsenyi Joachim
Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Vossstr. 2, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
BMC Public Health. 2005 Oct 4;5:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-99.
Diabetes model projects in different regions of Germany including interventions such as quality circles, patient education and documentation of medical findings have shown improvements of HbA1c levels, blood pressure and occurrence of hypoglycaemia in before-after studies (without control group). In 2002 the German Ministry of Health defined legal regulations for the introduction of nationwide disease management programs (DMP) to improve the quality of care in chronically ill patients. In April 2003 the first DMP for patients with type 2 diabetes was accredited. The evaluation of the DMP is essential and has been made obligatory in Germany by the Fifth Book of Social Code. The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of DMP by example of type 2 diabetes in the primary care setting of two German federal states (Rheinland-Pfalz and Sachsen-Anhalt).
METHODS/DESIGN: The study is three-armed: a prospective cluster-randomized comparison of two interventions (DMP 1 and DMP 2) against routine care without DMP as control group. In the DMP group 1 the patients are treated according to the current situation within the German-Diabetes-DMP. The DMP group 2 represents diabetic care within ideally implemented DMP providing additional interventions (e.g. quality circles, outreach visits). According to a sample size calculation a sample size of 200 GPs (each GP including 20 patients) will be required for the comparison of DMP 1 and DMP 2 considering possible drop-outs. For the comparison with routine care 4000 patients identified by diabetic tracer medication and age (> 50 years) will be analyzed.
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the German Diabetes-DMP compared to a Diabetes-DMP providing additional interventions and routine care in the primary care setting of two different German federal states.
德国不同地区的糖尿病模型项目,包括质量改进小组、患者教育以及医疗结果记录等干预措施,在前后对照研究(无对照组)中显示糖化血红蛋白水平、血压及低血糖发生率有所改善。2002年德国卫生部制定了全国性疾病管理项目(DMP)的法律法规,以提高慢性病患者的护理质量。2003年4月首个针对2型糖尿病患者的DMP获得认可。DMP的评估至关重要,德国《社会法典》第五卷已将其规定为强制性要求。本研究旨在以德国两个联邦州(莱茵兰 - 普法尔茨州和萨克森 - 安哈尔特州)基层医疗环境中的2型糖尿病为例,评估DMP的有效性。
方法/设计:本研究为三臂试验:将两种干预措施(DMP 1和DMP 2)与无DMP的常规护理进行前瞻性整群随机对照比较,其中常规护理作为对照组。在DMP第1组中,患者按照德国糖尿病DMP的现状进行治疗。DMP第2组代表理想实施的DMP中的糖尿病护理,提供额外干预措施(如质量改进小组、外展访视)。根据样本量计算,考虑到可能的失访情况,比较DMP 1和DMP 2需要200名全科医生(每位全科医生纳入20名患者)作为样本量。对于与常规护理的比较,将分析4000名通过糖尿病追踪药物和年龄(>50岁)确定的患者。
本研究将在德国两个不同联邦州的基层医疗环境中,评估德国糖尿病DMP与提供额外干预措施的糖尿病DMP及常规护理相比的有效性。