• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Disease management programs for type 2 diabetes in Germany: a systematic literature review evaluating effectiveness.德国 2 型糖尿病疾病管理计划:评估有效性的系统文献回顾
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Jun 27;111(26):453-63. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0453.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease.冠心病管理中的患者教育
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 28;6(6):CD008895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008895.pub3.
6
Management of frozen shoulder: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.冻结肩的治疗:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(11):1-264. doi: 10.3310/hta16110.
7
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services.青少年医疗护理从儿科服务向成人健康服务的过渡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4(4):CD009794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009794.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

引用本文的文献

1
GPs' experienced challenges and strategies for supporting patient self-management in disease management programs for type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease - a qualitative study.全科医生在2型糖尿病和冠心病疾病管理项目中支持患者自我管理所面临的挑战及策略——一项定性研究
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jul 12;26(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02896-w.
2
Data-driven segmentation of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: an observational study on health care utilisation prior to an emergency department visit in Germany.基于数据驱动的2型糖尿病患者细分:德国急诊科就诊前医疗保健利用情况的观察性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 16;12:1509220. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1509220. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluation of the Impact of Mobile Health App Vitadio in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.移动健康应用程序Vitadio对2型糖尿病患者影响的评估:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 9;27:e68648. doi: 10.2196/68648.
4
Use and application of geographical restrictions in systematic reviews with the aim of including studies about Germany: An update of a methodological review.以纳入有关德国的研究为目的在系统评价中使用和应用地理限制:方法学综述的更新
Health Info Libr J. 2024 Dec;41(4):339-359. doi: 10.1111/hir.12555. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
5
Exploring regional and sociodemographic disparities associated with unenrollment for the disease management program for type 2 Diabetes Mellitus using Bayesian spatial modelling.使用贝叶斯空间模型探索与2型糖尿病疾病管理项目未登记相关的区域和社会人口统计学差异。
Res Health Serv Reg. 2022 Aug 17;1(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s43999-022-00007-1.
6
[Development and Internal Validation of Case Definitions for Prevalence Estimation of Microvascular Complications of Diabetes in Routine Data].[糖尿病微血管并发症患病率估计病例定义在常规数据中的制定与内部验证]
Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Jul;86(S 03):S196-S204. doi: 10.1055/a-2061-6954. Epub 2023 May 30.
7
Prevalence, incidence and mortality of diabetes mellitus in adults in Germany - A review in the framework of the Diabetes Surveillance.德国成年人糖尿病的患病率、发病率和死亡率——糖尿病监测框架下的综述
J Health Monit. 2017 Oct 9;2(3):98-121. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2017-062. eCollection 2017 Oct.
8
Diabetes Surveillance in Germany - Background, concept and prospects.德国的糖尿病监测——背景、概念与前景
J Health Monit. 2017 Mar 15;2(1):83-95. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2017-022. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
12-Month prevalence of known diabetes mellitus in Germany.德国已知糖尿病的12个月患病率。
J Health Monit. 2017 Mar 15;2(1):43-50. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2017-017. eCollection 2017 Mar.
10
Trends of Antidiabetic and Cardiovascular Diseases Medication Prescriptions in Type 2 Diabetes between 2005 and 2017-A German Longitudinal Study Based on Claims Data.2005 年至 2017 年期间基于索赔数据的德国纵向研究:2 型糖尿病患者的抗糖尿病和心血管疾病药物处方趋势。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 3;20(5):4491. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054491.

本文引用的文献

1
Disease Management Evaluation: A Comprehensive Review of Current State of the Art.疾病管理评估:当前技术水平的全面综述
Rand Health Q. 2011 Mar 1;1(1):7. eCollection 2011 Spring.
2
[Prevalence and temporal trend of known diabetes mellitus: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1)].[已知糖尿病的患病率及时间趋势:德国成人健康访谈与检查调查(DEGS1)结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 May;56(5-6):668-77. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1662-5.
3
[Evaluating the effectiveness of a disease management program diabetes in the German Statutory Health Insurance: first results and methodological considerations].[评估德国法定医疗保险中糖尿病疾病管理项目的有效性:初步结果与方法学考量]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(9):649-55. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
4
[Follow up of the CoDiM-Study: Cost of diabetes mellitus 2000-2009].[CoDiM研究随访:2000 - 2009年糖尿病的花费]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012 May;137(19):1013-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304891. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
5
[The methods within the evaluation of disease management programmes in control-group designs using the example of diabetes mellitus - a systematic literature review].[以糖尿病为例,在使用对照组设计的疾病管理项目评估中的方法——一项系统文献综述]
Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Aug;74(8-9):496-501. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1301273. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
6
Care management for Type 2 diabetes in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.美国 2 型糖尿病的护理管理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 22;12:72. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-72.
7
Patients with type 2 diabetes benefit from primary care-based disease management: a propensity score matched survival time analysis.2 型糖尿病患者从基于初级保健的疾病管理中获益:倾向评分匹配生存时间分析。
Popul Health Manag. 2012 Aug;15(4):241-7. doi: 10.1089/pop.2011.0063. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
8
[The quality of chronic care in Germany].[德国慢性护理的质量]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(8):554-62. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.12.025. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
9
Life prolonging of disease management programs in patients with type 2 diabetes is cost-effective.将疾病管理方案应用于 2 型糖尿病患者可延长其寿命,具有成本效益。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;95(2):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.09.015. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
10
Health related quality of life and comorbidity. A descriptive analysis comparing EQ-5D dimensions of patients in the German disease management program for type 2 diabetes and patients in routine care.健康相关生命质量和合并症。比较德国 2 型糖尿病疾病管理计划患者和常规护理患者的 EQ-5D 维度的描述性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug 2;11:179. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-179.

德国 2 型糖尿病疾病管理计划:评估有效性的系统文献回顾

Disease management programs for type 2 diabetes in Germany: a systematic literature review evaluating effectiveness.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Shared authorship: Fuchs, Henschke and Blümel have equally contributed to the article.

出版信息

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Jun 27;111(26):453-63. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0453.

DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2014.0453
PMID:25019922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4101529/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disease management programs (DMPs) are intended to improve the care of persons with chronic diseases. Despite numerous studies there is no unequivocal evidence about the effectiveness of DMPs in Germany.

METHOD

We conducted a systematic literature review in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CCMed databases. Our analysis included all controlled studies in which patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in a DMP were compared to type 2 diabetes patients receiving routine care with respect to process, outcome, and economic parameters.

RESULTS

The 9 studies included in the analysis were highly divergent with respect to their characteristics and the process and outcome parameters studied in each. No study had data beyond the year 2008. In 3 publications, the DMP patients had a lower mortality than the control patients (2.3%, 11.3%, and 7.17% versus 4.7%, 14.4%, and 14.72%). In 2 publications, DMP participation was found to be associated with a mean survival time of 1044.94 (± 189.87) days, as against 985.02 (± 264.68) in the control group. No consistent effect was seen with respect to morbidity, quality of life, or economic parameters. 7 publications from 5 studies revealed positive effects on process parameters for DMP participants.

CONCLUSION

The observed beneficial trends with respect to mortality and survival time, as well as improvements in process parameters, indicate that DMPs can, in fact, improve the care of patients with diabetes. Further evaluation is needed, because some changes in outcome parameters (an important indicator of the quality of care) may only be observable over a longer period of time.

摘要

背景

疾病管理计划(DMP)旨在改善慢性病患者的护理。尽管有大量研究,但德国仍缺乏关于 DMP 有效性的明确证据。

方法

我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 CCMed 数据库中进行了系统文献综述。我们的分析包括所有将 2 型糖尿病患者纳入 DMP 的对照研究,这些患者与接受常规护理的 2 型糖尿病患者相比,在过程、结果和经济参数方面进行了比较。

结果

纳入分析的 9 项研究在其特征以及每项研究中研究的过程和结果参数方面存在很大差异。没有一项研究的数据超过 2008 年。在 3 篇出版物中,DMP 患者的死亡率低于对照组患者(2.3%、11.3%和 7.17%比 4.7%、14.4%和 14.72%)。在 2 篇出版物中,DMP 参与与平均生存时间 1044.94(±189.87)天相关,而对照组为 985.02(±264.68)天。在发病率、生活质量或经济参数方面没有观察到一致的效果。来自 5 项研究的 7 篇出版物揭示了 DMP 参与者的过程参数的有益趋势。

结论

死亡率和生存时间观察到的有利趋势,以及过程参数的改善,表明 DMP 确实可以改善糖尿病患者的护理。需要进一步评估,因为一些结局参数(护理质量的重要指标)的变化可能仅在较长时间内才能观察到。