Launo C
Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Universita' di Genova.
Minerva Anestesiol. 1992 Oct;58(10):849-52.
Different anesthetic techniques in perioperative times (intraoperative induction and maintenance of anaesthesia, recovery and 24 and 48 postoperative hours) were evaluated in 100 patients underwent general surgery. After randomization, 4 groups were clinically and statistically compared according to anesthesia technique (propofol + fentanyl in air/O2; isoflurane + fentanyl in air/O2; propofol + fentanyl in N2O/O2; isoflurane in N2O/O2). The results show that conduction of anesthesia without N2O is difficult; but the adequacy of induction and maintenance of anesthesia, the speed of recovery and the quality in the postoperative period show no difference in the anesthesia techniques used.
对100例行普通外科手术的患者在围手术期(术中麻醉诱导与维持、苏醒以及术后24小时和48小时)采用的不同麻醉技术进行了评估。随机分组后,根据麻醉技术(丙泊酚+芬太尼在空气/氧气中;异氟烷+芬太尼在空气/氧气中;丙泊酚+芬太尼在氧化亚氮/氧气中;异氟烷在氧化亚氮/氧气中)对4组进行了临床和统计学比较。结果表明,不使用氧化亚氮进行麻醉诱导困难;但在所采用的麻醉技术中,麻醉诱导和维持的充分性、苏醒速度以及术后质量并无差异。