Suppr超能文献

[不同的麻醉技术:多学科手术的实施与结果]

[Different anaesthetic technique: conduction and outcome from multidisciplinary procedures].

作者信息

Launo C

机构信息

Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Universita' di Genova.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 1992 Oct;58(10):849-52.

PMID:1461472
Abstract

Different anesthetic techniques in perioperative times (intraoperative induction and maintenance of anaesthesia, recovery and 24 and 48 postoperative hours) were evaluated in 100 patients underwent general surgery. After randomization, 4 groups were clinically and statistically compared according to anesthesia technique (propofol + fentanyl in air/O2; isoflurane + fentanyl in air/O2; propofol + fentanyl in N2O/O2; isoflurane in N2O/O2). The results show that conduction of anesthesia without N2O is difficult; but the adequacy of induction and maintenance of anesthesia, the speed of recovery and the quality in the postoperative period show no difference in the anesthesia techniques used.

摘要

对100例行普通外科手术的患者在围手术期(术中麻醉诱导与维持、苏醒以及术后24小时和48小时)采用的不同麻醉技术进行了评估。随机分组后,根据麻醉技术(丙泊酚+芬太尼在空气/氧气中;异氟烷+芬太尼在空气/氧气中;丙泊酚+芬太尼在氧化亚氮/氧气中;异氟烷在氧化亚氮/氧气中)对4组进行了临床和统计学比较。结果表明,不使用氧化亚氮进行麻醉诱导困难;但在所采用的麻醉技术中,麻醉诱导和维持的充分性、苏醒速度以及术后质量并无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验