Suppr超能文献

[Clinical and neuropsychologic evaluation of different anesthesia techniques (propofol vs isoflurane) in general surgery].

作者信息

Launo C, Palermo S, Riello R, Cammardella M P, Ughè R

机构信息

Cattedra di Terapia del Dolore, Università degli Studi di Genova.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 1994 Mar;60(3):95-108.

PMID:8090312
Abstract

Different anaesthetic techniques in the perioperative period (induction and maintenance of anesthesia, recovery and 48 postoperative hours) were evaluated in 200 patients undergoing general surgery. After randomization, results from 4 groups, were clinically and statistically compared according to the anesthetic techniques performed (propofol + fentanyl in air/O2; isoflurane + fentanyl in air/O2; propofol + fentanyl in N2O/O2; isoflurane in N2O/O2). The results show that anesthesia without N2O is difficult and fentanyl isn't the ideal analgesic; but no difference was found between the anesthetic techniques in quality of induction and maintenance, speed of recovery and quality of postoperative period.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验