Suppr超能文献

[Clinical and neuropsychologic evaluation of different anesthesia techniques (propofol vs isoflurane) in general surgery].

作者信息

Launo C, Palermo S, Riello R, Cammardella M P, Ughè R

机构信息

Cattedra di Terapia del Dolore, Università degli Studi di Genova.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 1994 Mar;60(3):95-108.

PMID:8090312
Abstract

Different anaesthetic techniques in the perioperative period (induction and maintenance of anesthesia, recovery and 48 postoperative hours) were evaluated in 200 patients undergoing general surgery. After randomization, results from 4 groups, were clinically and statistically compared according to the anesthetic techniques performed (propofol + fentanyl in air/O2; isoflurane + fentanyl in air/O2; propofol + fentanyl in N2O/O2; isoflurane in N2O/O2). The results show that anesthesia without N2O is difficult and fentanyl isn't the ideal analgesic; but no difference was found between the anesthetic techniques in quality of induction and maintenance, speed of recovery and quality of postoperative period.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验